Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32532111›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

On-Farm Welfare Assessment Protocol for Suckling Piglets: A Pilot Study.

Marika Vitali, Elena Santacroce, Federico Correa, Chiara Salvarani, Francesca Paola Maramotti, Barbara Padalino, Paolo Trevisi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Fattening Pigs with Tannin-Rich Source (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marika VitaliDepartment of Agricultural and Agri-food Sciences and Technologies, University of Bologna. Viale Fanin 46, 40138 Bologna (BO), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8373-0898
Elena SantacroceDepartment of Agricultural and Agri-food Sciences and Technologies, University of Bologna. Viale Fanin 46, 40138 Bologna (BO), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2766-7273
Federico CorreaDepartment of Agricultural and Agri-food Sciences and Technologies, University of Bologna. Viale Fanin 46, 40138 Bologna (BO), Italy.
Chiara SalvaraniDepartment of Agricultural and Agri-food Sciences and Technologies, University of Bologna. Viale Fanin 46, 40138 Bologna (BO), Italy.
Francesca Paola MaramottiDepartment of Agricultural and Agri-food Sciences and Technologies, University of Bologna. Viale Fanin 46, 40138 Bologna (BO), Italy.
Barbara PadalinoDepartment of Agricultural and Agri-food Sciences and Technologies, University of Bologna. Viale Fanin 46, 40138 Bologna (BO), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7630-8285
Paolo TrevisiDepartment of Agricultural and Agri-food Sciences and Technologies, University of Bologna. Viale Fanin 46, 40138 Bologna (BO), Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7019-6828

Funding

European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development Domanda n. 5112552 - Operazione 16.1.01 bando 2018 - FA 3A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Piglets experience welfare issues during the nursery phase. This pilot study aimed to test a protocol for identifying the main welfare issues in suckling piglets and to investigate relationships among animal-based indicators and management conditions. Litters (n = 134), composed of undocked and tail-docked piglets, were assessed at two farms. After birth, observations were made at the age of 7 days and 20 days. At each observation, housing conditions (HCs) were measured, and 13 animal-based indicators, modified from Welfare Quality, Classyfarm, Assurewel and others introduced ex novo, were recorded. A generalized linear mixed model was used, considering animal-based indicators as dependent variables and farm, piglets' age, tail docking and HCs as independent variables. The main welfare issues were lesions of the limb (32.6%) and the front area of the body (22.8%), a poor body condition score (BCS) (16.1%), ear lesions (15.5%), and tail lesions (9.7%). Negative social behaviour (e.g., fighting and biting) represented 7.0% of the active behaviour, with tail biting observed in 8.7% of the piglets. While lesions on the front areas of the body were mostly associated with the farm, tail lesions, low BCS, tear staining, and diarrhoea were associated with light and nest temperature (

Indexed as

aggressive behaviouranimal welfareear bitinghousing conditionsskin lesionssuckling pigletsswinetail bitingtail-dockingtear staining

Identifiers

PMID32532111
PMCPMC7341312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.