Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32531779›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Molecular mechanisms of splenectomy-induced hepatocyte proliferation.

Andrey V Elchaninov, Timur Kh Fatkhudinov, Polina A Vishnyakova, Maria P Nikitina, Anastasiya V Lokhonina, Andrey V Makarov, Irina V Arutyunyan, Evgeniya Y Kananykhina, Anastasiya S Poltavets, Kirill R Butov and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. CD300EExperimental & molecular medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Cellular effects of splenectomy on liver regeneration after 70% resection.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An Eye on Kupffer Cells: Development, Phenotype and the Macrophage Niche.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Andrey V ElchaninovLaboratory of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I.Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-2392-4439
Timur Kh FatkhudinovHistology Department, Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russian Federation.
Polina A VishnyakovaLaboratory of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I.Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Maria P NikitinaLaboratory of Growth and Development, Research Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Anastasiya V LokhoninaLaboratory of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I.Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Andrey V MakarovLaboratory of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I.Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Irina V ArutyunyanLaboratory of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I.Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Evgeniya Y KananykhinaLaboratory of Growth and Development, Research Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Anastasiya S PoltavetsLaboratory of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I.Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Kirill R ButovHistology Department, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-4664-6953
Igor I BaranovLaboratory of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I.Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Dmitry V GoldshteinLaboratory of Stem Cells Genetics, Research Center of Medical Genetics, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Galina B BolshakovaLaboratory of Growth and Development, Research Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Valeria V GlinkinaHistology Department, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Gennady T SukhikhLaboratory of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I.Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I.Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation · RUPirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RUResearch Institute of Human Morphology · RUPeoples' Friendship University of Russia · RUResearch Centre for Medical Genetics · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional and anatomical connection between the liver and the spleen is most clearly manifested in various pathological conditions of the liver (cirrhosis, hepatitis). The mechanisms of the interaction between the two organs are still poorly understood, as there have been practically no studies on the influence exerted by the spleen on the normal liver. Mature male Sprague-Dawley rats of 250-260 g body weight, 3 months old, were splenectomized. The highest numbers of Ki67+ hepatocytes in the liver of splenectomized rats were observed at 24 h after the surgery, simultaneously with the highest index of Ki67-positive hepatocytes. After surgical removal of the spleen, expression of certain genes in the liver tissues increased. A number of genes were upregulated in the liver at a single time point of 24 h, including Ccne1, Egf, Tnfa, Il6, Hgf, Met, Tgfb1r2 and Nos2. The expression of Ccnd1, Tgfb1, Tgfb1r1 and Il10 in the liver was upregulated over the course of 3 days after splenectomy. Monitoring of the liver macrophage populations in splenectomized animals revealed a statistically significant increase in the proportion of CD68-positive cells in the liver (as compared with sham-operated controls) detectable at 24 h and 48 h after the surgery. The difference in the liver content of CD68-positive cells between splenectomized and sham-operated animals evened out by day 3 after the surgery. No alterations in the liver content of CD163-positive cells were observed in the experiments. A decrease in the proportion of CD206-positive liver macrophages was observed at 48 h after splenectomy. The splenectomy-induced hepatocyte proliferation is described by us for the first time. Mechanistically, the effect is apparently induced by the removal of spleen as a major source of Tgfb1 (hepatocyte growth inhibitor) and subsequently supported by activation of proliferation factor-encoding genes in the liver.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationAnimalsHepatocytesInterleukin-6MacrophagesMaleNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySplenectomyTranscriptomeTransforming Growth Factor betaInterleukin-6Nitric Oxide Synthase Type IINos2 protein, ratTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID32531779
PMCPMC7292681
OpenAlexW3034564960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.