ArticleNeuroscience letters2020
(-)-Stepholidine blocks expression, but not development, of cocaine conditioned place preference in rats.
Article in Neuroscience letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prenatal Coca Paste Exposure Impairs Hippocampal Neuronal Development and Recognition Memory in Offspring.Neurotoxicity research · 2026Article
- Fluoroalkoxylated C-3 and C-9 (S)-12-bromostepholidine analogues with D1R antagonist activity.Bioorganic chemistry · 2023Article
- Structure-Activity Relationship Studies on 6-Chloro-1-phenylbenzazepines Leads to the Identification of a New Dopamine D1 Receptor Antagonist.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of (-)-stepholidine (SPD), a compound with dopamine D1 partial agonist and D2/D3 antagonist properties, on the development and expression of cocaine conditioned place preference (CPP). Subjects (N = 65; male Long Evans rats) were tested using a CPP procedure consisting of 3 phases: (1) a 15-min pre-exposure session where animals could explore each compartment freely, (2) eight 30-min conditioning sessions where animals were restricted to one side or the other with cocaine (10 mg/kg) or saline, respectively, on alternating days and (3) a 15-minute preference test session where animals could explore each compartment freely. To test the effects of SPD on expression of cocaine CPP, rats were administered vehicle (distilled water with 20 % DMSO), 10, 15 or 20 mg/kg SPD (intraperitoneally) 30 min prior to the test session. We found that 20 mg/kg of SPD significantly blocked the expression of cocaine CPP. To test the effects of SPD on the development of CPP, 0 (vehicle), 10, 15 or 20mg/kg SPD were administered 30 min prior to each cocaine conditioning session and vehicle before each saline conditioning session; no treatment was given prior to the test session. A preference test showed that each SPD group maintained a CPP similar to the vehicle group. These data indicate that SPD can block the expression of a cocaine CPP but has no effect on its development, suggesting that it inhibits the effects of cocaine cues on cocaine incentive motivated behavior. These results suggest that SPD may be a potential treatment for cue-driven aspects of cocaine use disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.