Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32531442›Full record

ArticleAnnals of diagnostic pathology2020

Automated quantification and architectural pattern detection of hepatic fibrosis in NAFLD.

Samer Gawrieh, Deepak Sethunath, Oscar W Cummings, David E Kleiner, Raj Vuppalanchi, Naga Chalasani, Mihran Tuceryan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of diagnostic pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samer GawriehDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America. Electronic address: sgawrieh@iu.edu.
Deepak SethunathDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Oscar W CummingsDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
David E KleinerLaboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Raj VuppalanchiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Naga ChalasaniDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Mihran TuceryanDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Postmortem PathologyZICBC010685 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KLEINER, DAVID ERWIN · 2009 to 2025
$14.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC BC010685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate detection and quantification of hepatic fibrosis remain essential for assessing the severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its response to therapy in clinical practice and research studies. Our aim was to develop an integrated artificial intelligence-based automated tool to detect and quantify hepatic fibrosis and assess its architectural pattern in NAFLD liver biopsies. Digital images of the trichrome-stained slides of liver biopsies from patients with NAFLD and different severity of fibrosis were used. Two expert liver pathologists semi-quantitatively assessed the severity of fibrosis in these biopsies and using a web applet provided a total of 987 annotations of different fibrosis types for developing, training and testing supervised machine learning models to detect fibrosis. The collagen proportionate area (CPA) was measured and correlated with each of the pathologists semi-quantitative fibrosis scores. Models were created and tested to detect each of six potential fibrosis patterns. There was good to excellent correlation between CPA and the pathologist score of fibrosis stage. The coefficient of determination (R

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAutomationAzo CompoundsBiopsyClinical Trials as TopicCollagenEosine Yellowish-(YS)FibrosisHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverLiver CirrhosisMethyl GreenNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseOrgan Dysfunction ScoresPathologistsAzo CompoundsCollagenEosine Yellowish-(YS)Methyl Greentrichrome stainArtificial intelligenceAutomationDigital image analysisNASH

Identifiers

PMID32531442
PMCPMC8495470
OpenAlexW3015981394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.