Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32531245›Full record

ArticleCell2020

Evidence That STK19 Is Not an NRAS-dependent Melanoma Driver.

Marta Rodríguez-Martínez, Thierry Boissiére, Melvin Noe Gonzalez, Kevin Litchfield, Richard Mitter, Jane Walker, Svend Kjœr, Mohamed Ismail, Julian Downward, Charles Swanton and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. STK19 positions TFIIH for cell-free transcription-coupled DNA repair.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. RAS pathway regulation in melanoma.Disease models & mechanisms · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Many Distinct Ways Lead to Drug Resistance inLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta Rodríguez-MartínezMechanisms of Transcription Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Thierry BoissiéreMechanisms of Transcription Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Melvin Noe GonzalezMechanisms of Transcription Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Kevin LitchfieldCancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Richard MitterBioinformatics and Biostatistics, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Jane WalkerMechanisms of Transcription Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Svend KjœrStructural Biology Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Mohamed IsmailOncogene Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Julian DownwardOncogene Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Charles SwantonCancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Jesper Q SvejstrupMechanisms of Transcription Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK. Electronic address: jesper.svejstrup@crick.ac.uk.
The Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11567Cancer Research UK 30712867Cancer Research UK FC001070Cancer Research UK FC001169Cancer Research UK FC001202Medical Research Council MR/P014712/1Medical Research Council MR/P014712/2Wellcome Trust FC001070Wellcome Trust FC001166Wellcome Trust FC001169Wellcome Trust FC001202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STK19 was proposed to be a cancer driver, and recent work by Yin et al. (2019) in Cell suggested that the frequently recurring STK19 D89N substitution represents a gain-of-function change, allowing increased phosphorylation of NRAS to enhance melanocyte transformation. Here we show that the STK19 gene has been incorrectly annotated, and that the expressed protein is 110 amino acids shorter than indicated by current databases. The "cancer driving" STK19 D89N substitution is thus outside the coding region. We also fail to detect evidence of the mutation affecting STK19 expression; instead, it is a UV signature mutation, found in the promoter of other genes as well. Furthermore, STK19 is exclusively nuclear and chromatin-associated, while no evidence for it being a kinase was found. The data in this Matters Arising article raise fundamental questions about the recently proposed role for STK19 in melanoma progression via a function as an NRAS kinase, suggested by Yin et al. (2019) in Cell. See also the response by Yin et al. (2020), published in this issue.

Indexed as

MelanomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalGenes, rasGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansMembrane ProteinsMutationNuclear ProteinsPhosphorylationProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSignal TransductionGTP PhosphohydrolasesMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanNuclear ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSTK19 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID32531245
PMCPMC7298618
OpenAlexW3034746973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.