ArticleChemical senses2020
Transient Effects of Cyclophosphamide on Basal Cell Proliferation of Olfactory Epithelia.
Article in Chemical senses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Azilsartan as a preventive agent against cyclophosphamide-induced testicular injury in male rats.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Cyclophosphamide-Induced Inflammation of Taste Buds and Cytoprotection by Amifostine.Chemical senses · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer is often treated with broad-spectrum cytotoxic drugs that not only eradicate cancerous cells but also have detrimental side effects. One of these side effects, disruption of the olfactory system, impedes a patient's ability to smell, perceive flavor, and ultimately may interfere with their nutritional intake and recovery from cancer. Recent studies reported that the chemotherapy drug, cyclophosphamide (CYP), can damage gustatory epithelia and disrupt cell proliferation in olfactory epithelia. In this study, we asked if CYP altered globose and horizontal basal cell proliferation in the murine main olfactory epithelium (MOE) and vomeronasal organ (VNO). We used antibodies for Ki67, a marker strictly associated with cell proliferation, and Keratin 5, a marker for the cytoskeleton of horizontal basal cells. Our results revealed a significant CYP-induced decrease in the number of proliferative cells in both epithelia, especially globose basal cells in the MOE, within the first 1-2 days postinjection. Recovery of cell renewal was apparent 6 days after injection. The immunohistochemical markers showed significantly higher levels of globose and horizontal basal cell proliferation in CYP-injected mice at 14 and 30 days postinjection compared with control mice. The prolonged proliferative activation of globose and horizontal basal cells suggests that, besides altering proliferation of olfactory epithelia, the epithelial substrate needed for successful cell renewal may be adversely affected by CYP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.