Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32530969›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Effects of the amount and type of carbohydrates used in type 2 diabetes diets in animal models: A systematic review.

Anaísa Martins Marques, Bárbara Silva Linhares, Rômulo Dias Novaes, Mariella Bontempo Freitas, Mariáurea Matias Sarandy, Reggiani Vilela Gonçalves

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anaísa Martins MarquesDepartment of Animal Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Bárbara Silva LinharesDepartment of Animal Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Rômulo Dias NovaesDepartment of Structural Biology, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Mariella Bontempo FreitasDepartment of Animal Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5132-242X
Mariáurea Matias SarandyDepartment of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Reggiani Vilela GonçalvesDepartment of Animal Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Viçosa · BRUniversidade Federal de Alfenas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is among the most prevalent diseases in the world, affecting over 420 million people. The disease is marked by a poor metabolic effect of insulin leading to chronic hyperglycaemia, which can result in microvascular complications. It is widely known that postprandial glycaemia is reliant on the total carbohydrate content of a meal. However, the importance of the amount and the source of these carbohydrates remains controversial due to mechanisms other than insulin secretion. Oxidative stress, inflammation, pyruvate production and the quality of the intestinal microbiota, resulting in plasma lipopolysaccharides and short-chain fatty acids production, play an important role in blood sugar control and consequently in type 2 diabetes. Thus, we systematically reviewed the preclinical evidences on the impact of the amount and type of carbohydrate found in different diets and its influence on blood glucose levels in diabetic animals. We used a comprehensive and structured search in biomedical databases Medline (PubMed), Scopus and Web of Science, recovering and analyzing 27 original studies. Results showed that sucrose-rich diets deteriorated diabetic condition in animal models regardless of the total dietary carbohydrate content. On the other hand, fiber, particularly resistant starch, improved blood glucose parameters through direct and indirect mechanisms, such as delayed gastric emptying and improved gut microbiota. All studies used rodents as animal models and male animals were preferred over females. Improvements in T2DM parameters in animal models were more closely related to the type of dietary carbohydrate than to its content on a diet, i. e., resistant starch seems to be the most beneficial source for maintaining normoglycemia. Results show that current literature is at high risk of bias due to neglecting experimental methods.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietDietary CarbohydratesDietary FiberDietary SucroseDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansInsulinInsulin SecretionMalePostprandial PeriodTriglyceridesBlood GlucoseDietary CarbohydratesDietary FiberDietary SucroseInsulinTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID32530969
PMCPMC7292416
OpenAlexW3034463222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.