ArticlePloS one2020
Subjective data, objective data and the role of bias in predictive modelling: Lessons from a dispositional learning analytics application.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Attendance Format with Learning Gain and National Examination Performance in a HyFlex Preparatory Course for Pharmacy Students.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning in mental health promotion for older adults: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Elite athletes' overall oral health, values and related quality of life: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Combining Self-Reported Information with Radiographic Bone Loss to Screen Periodontitis: A Performance Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Pop Culture in the Classroom: Associations with Student Learning Outcomes and the Underlying Psychological Mechanisms.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Technology Readiness Drives Digital Adoption in Dentistry: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Is age an effect modifier of the association between body mass index and physical function in patients with obesity?Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Health in Spanish older people: Dietary habits, lifestyles and related socioeconomic factors.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Online profiling of volunteers in public health emergencies: insights from COVID-19 in China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Preservice physical education teachers' professional action competence in education for sustainability: a mixed method research.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Parent's acceptance of advanced behavior management techniques on children during dental treatment.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Wearable network for multilevel physical fatigue prediction in manufacturing workers.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Psychometric benefits of self-chosen rating scales over given rating scales.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers: Palliative Care services for women with HIV in resource-limited settings.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Exploring the Interrelationships Between Physical Function, Functional Exercise Capacity, and Exercise Self-Efficacy in Persons Living with HIV.Clinical nursing research · 2024Article
- The middle-aged and older Chinese adults' health using actigraphy in Taiwan (MOCHA-T): protocol for a multidimensional dataset of health and lifestyle.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Development, Implementation, and Assessment of an Online Modular Telehealth Curriculum for Health Professions Students [Letter].Advances in medical education and practice · 2024Article
- Developing and validating an Interdisciplinary Teaching Readiness Scale (ITRS) for pre-service teachers in China.PloS one · 2024Article
- Cartilage repair strategies in the knee according to Dutch Orthopedic Surgeons: a survey study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Understanding the Effects of Smart-Speaker-Based Surveys on Panelist Experience in Immersive Consumer Testing.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For decades, self-report measures based on questionnaires have been widely used in educational research to study implicit and complex constructs such as motivation, emotion, cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies. However, the existence of potential biases in such self-report instruments might cast doubts on the validity of the measured constructs. The emergence of trace data from digital learning environments has sparked a controversial debate on how we measure learning. On the one hand, trace data might be perceived as "objective" measures that are independent of any biases. On the other hand, there is mixed evidence of how trace data are compatible with existing learning constructs, which have traditionally been measured with self-reports. This study investigates the strengths and weaknesses of different types of data when designing predictive models of academic performance based on computer-generated trace data and survey data. We investigate two types of bias in self-report surveys: response styles (i.e., a tendency to use the rating scale in a certain systematic way that is unrelated to the content of the items) and overconfidence (i.e., the differences in predicted performance based on surveys' responses and a prior knowledge test). We found that the response style bias accounts for a modest to a substantial amount of variation in the outcomes of the several self-report instruments, as well as in the course performance data. It is only the trace data, notably that of process type, that stand out in being independent of these response style patterns. The effect of overconfidence bias is limited. Given that empirical models in education typically aim to explain the outcomes of learning processes or the relationships between antecedents of these learning outcomes, our analyses suggest that the bias present in surveys adds predictive power in the explanation of performance data and other questionnaire data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.