Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32530941›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Chemoradiation for cervical cancer treatment portends high risk of pelvic floor dysfunction.

Taís Pereira Miguel, Carla Elaine Laurienzo, Eliney Ferreira Faria, Almir José Sarri, Isabela Queiroz Castro, Renato José Affonso Júnior, Carlos Eduardo Mattos da Cunha Andrade, Marcelo de Andrade Vieira, Ricardo Dos Reis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taís Pereira MiguelDepartment of Physiotherapy, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0474-8900
Carla Elaine LaurienzoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eliney Ferreira FariaDepartment of Urology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Almir José SarriDepartment of Physiotherapy, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Isabela Queiroz CastroDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renato José Affonso JúniorDepartment of Radiation Theraphy, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo Mattos da Cunha AndradeDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo de Andrade VieiraDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ricardo Dos ReisDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goalTo assess the impact of chemoradiation on pelvic floor (PF) muscle function after the treatment of cervical cancer (CC).

methodsWe performed a prospective cohort study of women between the ages of 20 and 70 years old who had a diagnosis of CC. Patients were treated with chemoradiation at the Barretos Cancer Hospital (BCH), between August 2016 and July 2017. We performed three evaluations at different time points after chemoradiation treatment to compare changes in muscle function. Pelvic floor muscle function was assessed through perineometry (PNM) and surface electromyography (EMG) at the following time points: Pretreatment Moment 1 (M1): evaluated before chemoradiation; Moment 2 (M2): at the first follow-up medical visit (usually 3 to 4 months after treatment); and Moment 3 (M3): at the second follow-up medical visit (usually after 6 to 9 months after treatment). Mean vaginal squeeze pressure levels were determined by PNM and muscle electromyographic activity by EMG and the results were evaluated by Generalized Linear Model comparisons.

resultsForty-nine patients were evaluated at M1; 35 at M2; and 32 at M3, so that 32 patients had all three muscle evaluations performed. There was a statistically significant increase in the frequency of women with urgency urinary incontinence at the M2 evaluation time (41.9%), compared to pretreatment M1 (18.6%), p<0.001. The means of the vaginal squeeze pressures reduced through M1 to M3 in the phasic (M1: 17.7 mmHg; M3: 11.27mmHg) and tonic contractions (M1: 10.56 mmHg; M3: 7.52mmHg), p = 0.01 and p = 0.03 respectively. There was no difference in pelvic floor function in the three evaluations M1-M3, measured by EMG. The pelvic floor strength assessed by PMN and their interactions with anthropometric, parity and hormonal status variables, showed that a high body mass index (BMI) significantly influenced decreases in pelvic floor muscle function before and after treatment.

conclusionThese results show that chemoradiation causes reduction of muscle function of the pelvic floor, especially in the late phase after the end of treatment. Both the high BMI and urgent urinary incontinence symptoms were related to decreased muscle strength.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChemoradiotherapyCohort StudiesElectromyographyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPelvic FloorProspective StudiesRadiation InjuriesUrinary IncontinenceUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32530941
PMCPMC7292417
OpenAlexW3034816044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.