Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32530831›Full record

SynthesisAlzheimer disease and associated disorders

Efficacy of Mealtime Interventions for Malnutrition and Oral Intake in Persons With Dementia: A Systematic Review.

James C Borders, Samantha Blanke, Stephen Johnson, Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi, Nicole Rogus-Pulia

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James C BordersDepartment of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Samantha BlankeUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.
Stephen JohnsonEbling Library for the Health Sciences.
Andrea Gilmore-BykovskyiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology.
Nicole Rogus-PuliaDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Funding

Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG062715 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Henrik Zetterberg · 2019 to 2026
$34.5M
Impact of Novel Rehabilitative Approaches FOR Dysphagia in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasK76AG068590 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ROGUS-PULIA, NICOLE M · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
Novel Approaches to Identifying and Engaging Disadvantaged Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) in Clinical ResearchK76AG060005 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GILMORE-BYKOVSKYI, ANDREA L · 2018 to 2022
$1.1M
Novel Therapeutic Interventions for Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Comorbid DysphagiaK23AG057805 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ROGUS-PULIA, NICOLE M · 2018 to 2020
$504k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG057805NIA NIH HHS K76 AG060005NIA NIH HHS K76 AG068590NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malnutrition and weight loss are highly prevalent in persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Oral intake is an important interventional target for addressing these nutritional consequences. However, the efficacy of interventions remains poorly understood as prior syntheses have failed to examine the impact of intervention approaches on malnutrition and hypothesized mechanisms of action in persons with dementia. This review aimed to determine the efficacy of mealtime interventions to improve oral intake and nutritional outcomes in persons with dementia. Four databases yielded 1712 studies, resulting in 32 studies that met inclusion criteria. Studies included education, environmental modifications, feeding, oral supplementation, and other pharmacologic/ecopsychological interventions. While the majority of studies reported statistically significant improvements in at least 1 nutritional outcome, study design and outcome measures were heterogenous with many lacking adequate statistical power or blinding. Collectively, we found moderate evidence to suggest the efficacy of oral supplementation, and preliminary evidence to suggest that feeding interventions, education, and environmental modifications may confer improvements. Findings clarify the state of existing evidence regarding various interventional strategies for improving malnutrition in persons with dementia. While some approaches are promising, adequately powered and rigorously designed multidimensional intervention trials are needed to inform clinical decision-making in real-world contexts.

Indexed as

EatingFeeding MethodsDementiaHumansMalnutritionMeals

Identifiers

PMID32530831
PMCPMC7679285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.