Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32530637›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2021

Alexander K Andrianov, Alexander Marin, Ruixue Wang, Ananda Chowdhury, Pragati Agnihotri, Abdul S Yunus, Brian G Pierce, Roy A Mariuzza, Thomas R Fuerst

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Polyphosphazene-Based Nanotherapeutics.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Polyphosphazene-Based Biomaterials for Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Polyphosphazene immunoadjuvants: Historical perspective and recent advances.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander K AndrianovInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6186-6156
Alexander MarinInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Ruixue WangInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Ananda ChowdhuryInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Pragati AgnihotriInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Abdul S YunusInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Brian G PierceInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Roy A MariuzzaInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Thomas R FuerstInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9766-9995
Advanced Bioscience Laboratories (United States) · US

Funding

Rational design and efficacy testing of vaccines against HCVR01AI168048 · NIAID · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Alexander Andrianov, Thomas R Fuerst · 2022 to 2026
$7.1M
Structure-Based Vaccine Design for Hepatits C VirusR01AI132213 · NIAID · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI ANDRIANOV, ALEXANDER, FOUNG, STEVEN · 2017 to 2021
$6.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI132213NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI168048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two well-defined synthetic polyphosphazene immunoadjuvants, PCPP and PCEP, were studied for their ability to potentiate the immune response to the hepatitis C virus (HCV) E2 glycoprotein antigen

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralDrug CarriersDrug CompoundingFemaleHepacivirusHepatitis CHepatitis C AntigensHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineMiceModels, AnimalOrganophosphorus CompoundsPolymersAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralDrug Carriersglycoprotein E2, Hepatitis C virusHepatitis C AntigensOrganophosphorus CompoundsPolymerspoly(phosphazene)Recombinant ProteinsVaccines, SubunitViral Envelope ProteinsViral Hepatitis Vaccinescomplexationhepatitis C virusimmunoadjuvantspolyphosphazenesself-assemblyvaccine deliveryvaccines

Identifiers

PMID32530637
PMCPMC7755742
OpenAlexW3035484455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.