ReviewCell proliferation2020
A review on methods for diagnosis of breast cancer cells and tissues.
Review in Cell proliferation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05708664 (Precision Breast Conserving Surgery With the Guidance of Localization Combined With Multidetector CT 3-dimensional Image Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Precision Breast Conserving Surgery With the Guidance of Localization Combined With Multidetector CT 3-dimensional Image Reconstruction: a Single Center, Prospective, Cohort Study.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 193 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of CA-125 for diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer: a systematic review.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Application of nanoparticles in breast cancer treatment: a systematic review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of nitrous oxide in adults undergoing puncture biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Expression and Signaling Pathways of Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) and Pro-NGF in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Research advances in aptamers in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
- AI-genomics synergy for drug repurposing in breast cancer: an interpretability-driven framework.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026Review
- FT-MDNNMDs: early detection of breast cancer using fine-tuned multi-deep neural networks with TCGA and clinical image datasets.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An accurate analytical modeling method for microwave-based breast tumor detection and phantom manufacturing.Biomedical engineering letters · 2026Article
- Spiegelmer Aptamers: Innovative Approach in Breast Cancer.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2026Review
- Breast cancer pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- The Role of Actin-Binding Proteins in Breast Cancer Progression.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- Multimodal feature fusion model for breast mass malignant risk stratification.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- MFF-ClassificationNet: CNN-Transformer Hybrid with Multi-Feature Fusion for Breast Cancer Histopathology Classification.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Potential of Serum ApoC1 as a Noninvasive Biomarker for Breast Cancer Detection and Prognosis: A Prospective Case-Control Study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Plasma Circular RNAs in Breast Cancer: From Biomarker Potential to Functional Significance.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Perceived barriers to timely diagnosis among Iranian women diagnosed with advanced breast cancer: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Leveraging an ensemble of EfficientNetV1 and EfficientNetV2 models for classification and interpretation of breast cancer histopathology images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Minimal Residual Disease Detection: Implications for Clinical Diagnosis and Cancer Patient Treatment.MedComm · 2025Review
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer has seriously been threatening physical and mental health of women in the world, and its morbidity and mortality also show clearly upward trend in China over time. Through inquiry, we find that survival rate of patients with early-stage breast cancer is significantly higher than those with middle- and late-stage breast cancer, hence, it is essential to conduct research to quickly diagnose breast cancer. Until now, many methods for diagnosing breast cancer have been developed, mainly based on imaging and molecular biotechnology examination. These methods have great contributions in screening and confirmation of breast cancer. In this review article, we introduce and elaborate the advances of these methods, and then conclude some gold standard diagnostic methods for certain breast cancer patients. We lastly discuss how to choose the most suitable diagnostic methods for breast cancer patients. In general, this article not only summarizes application and development of these diagnostic methods, but also provides the guidance for researchers who work on diagnosis of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.