Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32530424›Full record

SynthesisThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2020

Efficacy and tolerability of artemisinin-based and quinine-based treatments for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

Makoto Saito, Rashid Mansoor, Kalynn Kennon, Anupkumar R Anvikar, Elizabeth A Ashley, Daniel Chandramohan, Lauren M Cohee, Umberto D'Alessandro, Blaise Genton, Mary Ellen Gilder and 31 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors at 20 institutions in 18 countries.

Makoto SaitoWorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN), Oxford, UK; Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: makoto.saito@wwarn.org.
Rashid MansoorWorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN), Oxford, UK; Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kalynn KennonWorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN), Oxford, UK; Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Anupkumar R AnvikarIndian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Malaria Research, New Delhi, India.
Elizabeth A AshleyNuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit, Vientiane, Laos.
Daniel ChandramohanDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lauren M CoheeCenter for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Umberto D'AlessandroMedical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia.
Blaise GentonDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University Center of General Medicine and Public Health, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mary Ellen GilderShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Elizabeth JumaKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Linda Kalilani-PhiriDepartment of Medicine, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Irene KuepferDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Miriam K LauferCenter for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Khin Maung LwinShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Steven R MeshnickDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, NC, USA.
Dominic MoshaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Victor MwapasaDepartment of Medicine, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Norah MwebazaInfectious Disease Research Collaboration, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Michael NamboziDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Tropical Diseases Research Centre, Ndola, Zambia.
Jean-Louis A NdiayeDepartment of Parasitology, Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
François NostenNuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Myaing NyuntDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Bernhards OgutuKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sunil ParikhDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Moo Kho PawShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Aung Pyae PhyoShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Myanmar-Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Yangon, Myanmar.
Mupawjay PimanpanarakShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patrice PiolaEpidemiology and Public Health Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Marcus J RijkenShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Kanlaya SriprawatShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Harry K TagborSchool of Medicine, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Joel TarningWorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN), Oxford, UK; Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Halidou TintoClinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Innocent ValéaClinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Neena ValechaIndian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Malaria Research, New Delhi, India.
Nicholas J WhiteNuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jacher WiladphaingernShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kasia StepniewskaWorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN), Oxford, UK; Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rose McGreadyNuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Philippe J GuérinWorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN), Oxford, UK; Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: philippe.guerin@wwarn.org.
Shoklo Malaria Research Unit · THMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · THUniversity of Oxford · GBInfectious Diseases Data Observatory · GBInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFKenya Medical Research Institute · KELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Malawi · MWUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USCheikh Anta Diop University · SNDuke Institute for Health Innovation · USIfakara Health Institute · TZIndian Council of Medical Research · INInstitut Pasteur du Cambodge · KHMahidol University · THMakerere University · UGMRC Unit the Gambia · GMNational Institute of Malaria Research · INSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHTropical Diseases Research Centre · ZM

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Medical Research Council MC_UP_A900_1119NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria in pregnancy affects both the mother and the fetus. However, evidence supporting treatment guidelines for uncomplicated (including asymptomatic) falciparum malaria in pregnant women is scarce and assessed in varied ways. We did a systematic literature review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and tolerability of different artemisinin-based or quinine-based treatments for malaria in pregnant women.

methodsWe did a systematic review of interventional or observational cohort studies assessing the efficacy of artemisinin-based or quinine-based treatments in pregnancy. Seven databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Literatura Latino Americana em Ciencias da Saude) and two clinical trial registries (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched. The final search was done on April 26, 2019. Studies that assessed PCR-corrected treatment efficacy in pregnancy with follow-up of 28 days or more were included. Investigators of identified studies were invited to share data from individual patients. The outcomes assessed included PCR-corrected efficacy, PCR-uncorrected efficacy, parasite clearance, fever clearance, gametocyte development, and acute adverse events. One-stage IPD meta-analysis using Cox and logistic regression with random-effects was done to estimate the risk factors associated with PCR-corrected treatment failure, using artemether-lumefantrine as the reference. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018104013.

findingsOf the 30 studies assessed, 19 were included, representing 92% of patients in the literature (4968 of 5360 episodes). Risk of PCR-corrected treatment failure was higher for the quinine monotherapy (n=244, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 6·11, 95% CI 2·57-14·54, p<0·0001) but lower for artesunate-amodiaquine (n=840, 0·27, 95% 0·14-0·52, p<0·0001), artesunate-mefloquine (n=1028, 0·56, 95% 0·34-0·94, p=0·03), and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (n=872, 0·35, 95% CI 0·18-0·68, p=0·002) than artemether-lumefantrine (n=1278) after adjustment for baseline asexual parasitaemia and parity. The risk of gametocyte carriage on day 7 was higher after quinine-based therapy than artemisinin-based treatment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 7·38, 95% CI 2·29-23·82).

interpretationEfficacy and tolerability of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) in pregnant women are better than quinine. The lower efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine compared with other ACTs might require dose optimisation.

fundingThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, ExxonMobil Foundation, and the University of Oxford Clarendon Fund.

Indexed as

AmodiaquineAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimalarialsArtemisininsArtesunateAtovaquoneClindamycinDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMalaria, FalciparumMefloquinePiperazinesPregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticAmodiaquineamodiaquine, artesunate drug combinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimalarialsArtemisininsartenimolArtesunateAtovaquoneClindamycinDrug CombinationsMefloquinepiperaquinePiperazinesProguanilPyrimethamineQuinineQuinolinesSulfadoxine

Identifiers

PMID32530424
PMCPMC7391007
OpenAlexW3023795748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.