Trial reportBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2020
Patients' satisfaction associated with portable coagulometers for warfarin monitoring: a cross-sectional study.
Trial report in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Health Related Quality of Life of Ugandan Children Following Valve Replacement Surgery for Rheumatic Heart Disease.Global heart · 2023Article
- Position Statement on In-hospital/Clinic Point-of-care Coagulation Testing for Anticoagulation Monitoring in Saudi Arabia.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of point-of-care (POC) coagulometers for monitoring patients on vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment makes international normalised ratio (INR) results immediately available. The aim of this study was to compare patients' satisfaction with VKA treatment in two settings characterised by distinct ways of monitoring: POC INR versus laboratory INR. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe recruited adult patients on long-term warfarin treatment (July 2017-February 2018) from the Anticoagulation Clinics at five district health centres (namely Cospicua, Floriana, Mosta, Qormi, Rabat-POC INR) and at Mater Dei Hospital (Msida - Laboratory INR) in Malta. We administered two psychometric questionnaires: the Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS) (range 25-175, lower scores corresponding to higher satisfaction) and the Perception of Anticoagulation Treatment Questionnaire (PACT-Q2) (range 0-100, higher scores corresponding to higher satisfaction).
resultsWe analysed 313 questionnaires (POC INR n=159, laboratory INR n=154). In the POC INR cohort, median age was 72 years and 59.1% were males; in the laboratory INR cohort, median age was 70.5 years and 46.1% were males. The POC INR cohort obtained significantly lower overall DASS score (p<0.001) and significantly higher PACT-Q2 scores (p<0.001 for the subscale "convenience"; p=0.039 for the subscale "anticoagulant treatment satisfaction") than the laboratory INR cohort. In multiple regression analysis, the use of POC coagulometers was significantly associated with the overall DASS score (p=0.013) and the PACT-Q2 convenience score (p=0.012). DISCUSSION: Patients on warfarin treatment were generally satisfied. Patients monitored with the POC INR with a dedicated time slot reported less inconvenience and burdens and better psychological impact than patients monitored with the traditional laboratory INR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.