Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32530386›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2020

Self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health and rights for advancing universal health coverage.

Manjulaa Narasimhan, Carmen H Logie, Alice Gauntley, Rodolfo Gomez Ponce de Leon, Karima Gholbzouri, Nandi Siegfried, Heather Abela, Leopold Ouedraogo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Manjulaa NarasimhanScientist, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research; UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0598-6887
Carmen H LogieAssociate Professor, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8035-433X
Alice GauntleyResearch Assistant, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Rodolfo Gomez Ponce de LeonSexual and Reproductive Health Regional Advisor, PAHO/AMRO, Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-7130
Karima GholbzouriMedical Officer, Women's Reproductive Health, EMRO, Cairo, Egypt.
Nandi SiegfriedIndependent Clinical Epidemiologist, Cape Town, South Africa.
Heather AbelaResearch Assistant, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-4616
Leopold OuedraogoRegional Advisor, Reproductive and Women's Health (RWH), AFRO, Brazzaville, Congo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5842-1842
University of Toronto · CAWorld Health Organization · CHWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa · CG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WHO's normative guidance on self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) promotes comprehensive, integrated and people-centred approaches to health service delivery. Implementation of self-care interventions within the context of human rights, gender equality, and a life course approach, offers an underused opportunity to improve universal health coverage (UHC) for all. Results from an online global values and preferences survey provided lay persons' and healthcare providers' perspectives on access, acceptability, and implementation considerations. This analysis examines 326 qualitative responses to open-ended questions from healthcare providers (n = 242) and lay persons (n = 70) from 77 countries. Participants were mostly women (66.9%) and were from the Africa (34.5%), America (32.5%), South-East Asia (5.6%), European (19.8%), Eastern Mediterranean (4.8%), and Western Pacific regions (2.8%). Participants perceived multiple benefits of self-care interventions for SRHR, including: reduced exposure to stigma, discrimination and access barriers, increased confidentiality, empowerment, self-confidence, and informed decision-making. Concerns include insufficient knowledge, affordability, and possible side-effects. Implementation considerations highlighted the innovative approaches to linkages with health services. Introduction of self-care interventions is a paradigm shift in health care delivery bridging people and communities through primary health care to reach UHC. Self-care interventions can be leveraged by countries as gateways for reaching more people with quality, accessible and equitable services that is critical for achieving UHC. The survey results underscored the urgent need to reduce stigma and discrimination, increase access to and improve knowledge of self-care interventions for SRHR for laypersons and healthcare providers to advance SRHR.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityReproductive Health ServicesCommunity ParticipationFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleReproductive HealthReproductive RightsSelf CareSexual HealthSocial StigmaSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversal Health Insurancehealth deliveryhuman rightsself-care interventionssexual and reproductive healthuniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID32530386
PMCPMC7887951
OpenAlexW3034624933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.