Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32529975›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice2020

How many alcohol-attributable deaths and hospital admissions could be prevented by alternative pricing and taxation policies? Modelling impacts on alcohol consumption, revenues and related harms in Canada.

Tim Stockwell, Samuel Churchill, Adam Sherk, Justin Sorge, Paul Gruenewald

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. What proportion of the price of a typical alcoholic beverage is taxation in Canada and why does it matter?Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Problematic substance use or problematic substance use policies?Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tim StockwellCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Samuel ChurchillCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Adam SherkCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Justin SorgeCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Paul GruenewaldPrevention Research Center, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
University of Victoria · CACancer Prevention Institute of California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2017, Canada increased alcohol excise taxes for the first time in over three decades. In this article, we describe a model to estimate various effects of additional tax and price policies that are predicted to improve health outcomes.

methodsWe obtained alcohol sales and taxation data for 2016/17 for all Canadian jurisdictions from Statistics Canada and product-level sales data for British Columbia. We modelled effects of alternative price and tax policies - revenue-neutral taxes, inflation-adjusted taxes and minimum unit prices (MUPs) - on consumption, revenues and harms. We used published price elasticities to estimate impacts on consumption and revenue and the International Model for Alcohol Harms and Policies (InterMAHP) to estimate impacts on alcohol-attributable mortality and morbidity.

resultsOther things being equal, revenue-neutral alcohol volumetric taxes (AVT) would have minimal influence on overall alcohol consumption and related harms. Inflation-adjusted AVT would result in 3.83% less consumption, 329 fewer deaths and 3762 fewer hospital admissions. A MUP of $1.75 per standard drink (equal to 17.05mL ethanol) would have reduced consumption by 8.68% in 2016, which in turn would have reduced the number of deaths by 732 and the number of hospitalizations by 8329 that year. Indexing alcohol excise taxes between 1991/92 and 2016/17 would have resulted in the federal government gaining approximately $10.97 billion. We estimated this could have prevented 4000-5400 deaths and 43 000-56 000 hospitalizations.

conclusionImproved public health outcomes would be made possible by (1) increasing alcohol excise tax rates across all beverages to compensate for past failures to index rates, and (2) setting a MUP of at least $1.75 per standard drink. While reducing alcohol-caused harms, these tax policies would have the added benefit of increasing federal government revenues.

Indexed as

Alcoholic BeveragesAlcoholismAlcohol-Related DisordersGovernment RegulationTaxesCanadaCosts and Cost AnalysisHealth PolicyHospitalizationHumansMortalityPreventive Health ServicesPublic Policyalcohol policyInterMAHPInternational Model for Alcohol Harms and Policiesminimum unit pricingmorbiditymortalitypolicy modelingtaxation

Identifiers

PMID32529975
PMCPMC7367427
OpenAlexW3035761234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.