Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32529683›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2020

Measuring intrarater association between correlated ordinal ratings.

Kerrie P Nelson, Thomas J Zhou, Don Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kerrie P NelsonDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1195-8105
Thomas J ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Don EdwardsDepartment of Statistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

Funding

Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KARLA M KERLIKOWSKE · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
Improving Accuracy and Reliability in Cancer Screening TestsR01CA226805 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI NELSON, KERRIE P · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
Model Agreement in Cancer Diagnostic TestsR01CA172463 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI NELSON, KERRIE P · 2014 to 2017
$995k
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201100031CNCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172463NCI NIH HHS R01 CA226805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variability between raters' ordinal scores is commonly observed in imaging tests, leading to uncertainty in the diagnostic process. In breast cancer screening, a radiologist visually interprets mammograms and MRIs, while skin diseases, Alzheimer's disease, and psychiatric conditions are graded based on clinical judgment. Consequently, studies are often conducted in clinical settings to investigate whether a new training tool can improve the interpretive performance of raters. In such studies, a large group of experts each classify a set of patients' test results on two separate occasions, before and after some form of training with the goal of assessing the impact of training on experts' paired ratings. However, due to the correlated nature of the ordinal ratings, few statistical approaches are available to measure association between raters' paired scores. Existing measures are restricted to assessing association at just one time point for a single screening test. We propose here a novel paired kappa to provide a summary measure of association between many raters' paired ordinal assessments of patients' test results before versus after rater training. Intrarater association also provides valuable insight into the consistency of ratings when raters view a patient's test results on two occasions with no intervention undertaken between viewings. In contrast to existing correlated measures, the proposed kappa is a measure that provides an overall evaluation of the association among multiple raters' scores from two time points and is robust to the underlying disease prevalence. We implement our proposed approach in two recent breast-imaging studies and conduct extensive simulation studies to evaluate properties and performance of our summary measure of association.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammographyObserver VariationComputer SimulationDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansReproducibility of Resultsassociationgeneralized linear mixed modelmodel-based kappaordinal classificationsscreening test

Identifiers

PMID32529683
PMCPMC7649720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.