Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32529587›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2020

Bioprospecting for Antibacterial Drugs: a Multidisciplinary Perspective on Natural Product Source Material, Bioassay Selection and Avoidable Pitfalls.

T P Tim Cushnie, Benjamart Cushnie, Javier Echeverría, Winita Fowsantear, Sutthiwan Thammawat, Jolyon L A Dodgson, Samantha Law, Simon M Clow

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. In vitro antimicrobial activity of Thai stick cannabis Hang Kra Rog Phu Phan (Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Commercially available antiseptics show highFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. SynthesizedNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Connective Tissue Growth Factor: Regulation, Diseases, and Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T P Tim CushnieFaculty of Medicine, Mahasarakham University, 269 Nakornsawan Road, Mahasarakham, 44000, Thailand. tim.c@msu.ac.th.
Benjamart CushnieFaculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Kantarawichai, Thailand.
Javier EcheverríaFacultad de Química y Biología, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Winita FowsantearFaculty of Medicine, Mahasarakham University, 269 Nakornsawan Road, Mahasarakham, 44000, Thailand.
Sutthiwan ThammawatFaculty of Medicine, Mahasarakham University, 269 Nakornsawan Road, Mahasarakham, 44000, Thailand.
Jolyon L A DodgsonMyerscough College, Preston, Lancashire, UK.
Samantha LawNational Collection of Industrial, Food and Marine Bacteria (NCIMB) Ltd, Aberdeen, UK.
Simon M ClowPMI BioPharma Solutions LLC, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioprospecting is the exploration, extraction and screening of biological material and sometimes indigenous knowledge to discover and develop new drugs and other products. Most antibiotics in current clinical use (eg. β-lactams, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, macrolides) were discovered using this approach, and there are strong arguments to reprioritize bioprospecting over other strategies in the search for new antibacterial drugs. Academic institutions should be well positioned to lead the early stages of these efforts given their many thousands of locations globally and because they are not constrained by the same commercial considerations as industry. University groups can lack the full complement of knowledge and skills needed though (eg. how to tailor screening strategy to biological source material). In this article, we review three key aspects of the bioprospecting literature (source material and in vitro antibacterial and toxicity testing) and present an integrated multidisciplinary perspective on (a) source material selection, (b) legal, taxonomic and other issues related to source material, (c) cultivation methods, (d) bioassay selection, (e) technical standards available, (f) extract/compound dissolution, (g) use of minimum inhibitory concentration and selectivity index values to identify progressible extracts and compounds, and (h) avoidable pitfalls. The review closes with recommendations for future study design and information on subsequent steps in the bioprospecting process.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiological AssayBiological ProductsBioprospectingComplex MixturesDrug DiscoveryEukaryotaHumansSolubilitySolventsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological ProductsComplex MixturesSolventsbiolawdrug discoveryecologyethnomedicinenatural products

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.