ReviewHealth economics review2020
Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions.
Review in Health economics review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Burden of Informal Caregiving for Adults with Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Estimation of 'spectrum value': A discrete choice experiment to investigate the willingness-to-pay for narrow-spectrum based on other antimicrobial characteristics.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing Dietary Supplement Selection Among Older Adults in Iran: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Testing Preferences in Rural and Vulnerable Populations During a Pandemic: Discrete Choice Experiment.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Oncologists' preferences for frontline TKI treatment of Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a discrete choice experiment.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Parent Preferences for Acute Respiratory Tract Infection Care.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Precision Mental Healthcare: Identifying Service Preferences Through Discrete-Choice Experiments in Chinese Megacities.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025Article
- Article
- Patient preferences for key organizational features of primary cardiovascular care in Quebec: a discrete choice experiment.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Deriving Health Utilities from the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire - Parent Form (FAQLQ-PF) Using Mapping and Discrete Choice Experiments.Patient related outcome measures · 2025Article
- Patient preferences for Remote cochlear implant management: A discrete choice experiment.PloS one · 2025Article
- Association of race, ethnicity, and housing stability with COVID-19 testing method by investigators in underserved populations 2020-2023.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Subgroup differences in public attitudes, preferences and self-reported behaviour related to deceased organ donation before and after the introduction of the 'soft' opt-out consent system in England: mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Does targeted information impact consumers' preferences for value-based health insurance? Evidence from a survey experiment.Health economics review · 2024Article
- The elicitation of patient and physician preferences for calculating consumer-based composite measures on hospital report cards: results of two discrete choice experiments.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Article
- Article
- Strategies for engaging older adults and informal caregivers in health policy development: A scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Examining alignment of community health teams' preferences for health, equity, and spending with state all-payer waiver priorities: A discrete choice experiment.Health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModels of preferences in health services research (HSR) and Health Economics are often defined by readily available information, such as that captured in claims data and electronic health records. Yet many important questions about patient choices cannot be easily studied because of a lack of critical data elements. The objective of this review is to outline the advantages of using stated preferences (SP) data in health services research, and to outline how these methods can be used to evaluate choices that have not yet been offered or studied. MAIN BODY: This article focuses on the application of DCE's to relevant policy and health system delivery questions currently relevant, particularly in the United States. DCE's may be helpful to collect data from patient or consumer data that we currently do not have. The article provides examples of research questions that have been answered using SP data collected with a DCE. It outlines how to construct a DCE and how to analyze the data. It also discusses the methodological challenges and emphasizes important considerations regarding the design and estimation methods. SP data can be adopted in situations where we would like to have consumer choice data, but we currently do not. These are often hypothetical situations to analyze the decision-making process of individuals. With SP data it is possible to analyze trade-offs patients make when choosing between treatment options where these hard to measure attributes are important.
conclusionThis paper emphasizes that a carefully designed DCE and appropriate estimation methods can open up a new world of data regarding trade-offs patients and providers in healthcare are willing to make. It updates previous "how to" guide for DCE's for health services researchers and health economists who are not familiar with these methods or have been unwilling to use them and updates previous description of these methods with timely examples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.