ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021
Salivary biomarkers in breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of CA-125 for diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer: a systematic review.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Salivary biomarkers in breast cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Extraoral Detection of Biomarkers and Pathogens in Saliva: Comprehensive, Panoramic Review.Biosensors · 2026Review
- How Does Breast Cancer Heterogeneity Determine Changes in Tumor Marker Levels in Saliva?Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Salivary microbiome changes distinguish response to chemoradiotherapy in patients with oral cancer.Microbiome · 2023Article
- Liquid-based biomarkers in breast cancer: looking beyond the blood.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Potential Diagnostic Value of Salivary Tumor Markers in Breast, Lung and Ovarian Cancer: A Preliminary Study.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Article
- Association between periodontitis and breast cancer: two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Observational
- Liquid Biopsy as a Tool for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Monitoring of Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- «Salivaomics» of Different Molecular Biological Subtypes of Breast Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Article
- Prognostic Value of Salivary Biochemical Indicators in Primary Resectable Breast Cancer.Metabolites · 2022Article
- Potential Diagnostic Significance of Salivary Copper Determination in Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study.Biological trace element research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe objective was to evaluate the diagnostic value of salivary biomarkers in breast cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective study was carried out of 91 consecutive breast cancer patients and 60 controls without neoplastic disease. Demographic data were recorded, along with the Hospital Anxiety Depression (HAD), risk for development periodontal diseases questionnaire and Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores, and the TNM classification and stage of the primary tumor. Unstimulated basal saliva samples were collected and stored at - 80 °C until analysis.
resultsThe mean salivary CA125 concentration was 102.1 pg/ml in the control group and 267.6 pg/ml in the breast cancer group (p = 0.005). The soluble Fas (sFas) concentration in turn was 84.1 pg/ml and 145.9 pg/ml, respectively (p = 0.008). None of the biomarkers was related to questionnaire-assessed risk for development of periodontal diseases. The area under the ROC curve was 0.68 for CA125 (95% CI, 0.05-0.56) and 0.67 for sFas (95% CI, 0.08-0.55).
conclusionsThe salivary biomarkers CA125 and sFas appear to be promising tools in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.