Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32529401›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Application of the new SMS system of cochleovestibular anomalies: our experience with nine cases of type III anomaly.

Mohnish Grover, Anupam Kanodia, Gaurav Gupta, Chappity Preetam, Sunil Samdani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. New SMS Classification of Cochleovestibular Anomalies: Our Experience with 25 Cases of Type I Anomaly.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2021
    Article
  2. Cerebrospinal fluid gusher in incomplete partition type I anomaly.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  3. Authors' reply to the published comment regarding our article: Application of the new SMS system of cochleovestibular anomalies: our experience with nine cases of type III anomaly.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mohnish GroverDepartment of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Anupam KanodiaDepartment of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. Kanodiaanupam@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3933-0416
Gaurav GuptaDepartment of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India.
Chappity PreetamDepartment of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneshwar, India.
Sunil SamdaniDepartment of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
SMS Medical College · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INSardar Patel Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo present and analyse the radiological findings, surgical findings, pre-implantation and post-implantation speech and hearing outcomes of nine children with SMS Type III cochleovestibular malformation. STUDY

designRetrospective case series of nine children with pre-lingual profound sensorineural hearing loss who underwent cochlear implantation (Jan 2012 to July 2019). These children had been classified as Type III malformation according to the SMS Classification of cochleovestibular anomalies. Facial nerve anomalies, CSF leaks and any other significant surgical finding were noted. Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) was used to report the child's pre-operative and two-year post-implantation auditory and speech abilities. Any significant improvement was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsOut of nine patients, five patients sustained CSF gushers, while three patients had mild CSF leak, which were plugged adequately. No facial nerve anomalies were encountered. Post-op course was uneventful for all nine patients. MAIS scores at a two-year follow-up showed significant statistical improvement (P < 0.05) when compared to pre-operative scores.

conclusionCochlear implant is the treatment of choice for children with type III cochleovestibular malformation. There are significant auditory and speech improvements expected. However, the surgeon should bear in mind the risk of CSF leak and subsequent meningitis.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationHearing Loss, SensorineuralChildCochlear ImplantsHearingHumansRetrospective StudiesSpeech PerceptionTreatment OutcomeCochleovestibular anomaliesCSF leakSMS type III cochleovestibular malformations

Identifiers

PMID32529401
OpenAlexW3035172679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.