ArticleHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2020
Hypertension prevalence in Colombian Patients Evaluated with Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring According to Changes in Clinical Guidelines Between 2017-2018.
Article in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliability and device objectivity in oscillatory blood pressure measurement - a measurement error analysis to inform clinical decision making.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Nocturnal Stage 1 Hypertension Defined by 2025 Guidelines in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Hypertension for the Middle-Aged Population (30-59 Years) in Iran: A National Cross-Sectional Study.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe latest American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Guidelines for high blood pressure in adults bring changes with lower cut-off points, creating socioeconomic issues in low and middle income countries. It is necessary to consider the changes that would have the adherence to these new guidelines in diagnosis and hypertension (HTN) control with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), the gold standard for hypertension diagnosis.
aimTo describe the changes in hypertension diagnosis and control according to the latest ACC/AHA guidelines, the European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) and Latin-America Society of Hypertension (LASH) guidelines.
methodsCross-sectional, descriptive, retrospective study of all patients who have had an ABPM during June 2017 and June 2018 according to cut-off points established by the ACC/AHA Guidelines compared to the ESC/LASH Guidelines.
results1957 patients evaluated with ABPM were included; median age was 57 years, 55% were female. The difference in diagnosis by 24-h ABPM, day-time, and night-time cycle was 21%, 42%, and 24% higher applying ACC/AHA guidelines vs ESC/ESH guidelines. There were no significant differences regarding the history of HTN, gender, and age in the circadian pattern.
conclusionIf the measured value of blood pressure in the 24-h ABPM is taken into account, it would necessary to intervene pharmacologically 21.5% more individuals according to the ACC/AHA guidelines in our population, Individualization is awarded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.