Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32529350›Full record

ReviewHead and neck pathology2021

Orbit Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A Proposed Risk Prediction Model Based on a Case Series and Comprehensive Literature Review.

Lester D R Thompson, Sofia S Liou, Kenneth A Feldman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Head and neck pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Solitary fibrous tumor: an updated review.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Forehead.Indian dermatology online journal · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Mandible.Head and neck pathology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prevalence ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lester D R ThompsonDepartment of Pathology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, 5601 De Soto Avenue, Woodland Hills, CA, 91365, USA. Lester.D.Thompson@kp.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3714-1432
Sofia S LiouDepartment of Pathology, University of California: Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kenneth A FeldmanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Harbor City, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) of the orbit are rare. In order to further characterize the clinical and pathologic features of solitary fibrous tumor arising at this anatomic site, 12 cases of orbital SFTs were analyzed in conjunction with a review of 263 cases reported from the English literature in order to develop a risk prediction model. SFTs of the orbit were equally distributed between males (n = 5) and females (n = 7) with a mean patient age of 46.8 years (median 44.5 years; range 18-76 years) at initial diagnosis. The patients typically presented with swelling or mass around the orbit, with proptosis (n = 10), ptosis (n = 5), and visual changes (n = 6). Tumors were orbital (n = 10) or upper eyelid (n = 2). Mean tumor size was 2.5 cm (median 2.6 cm). Microscopically, the tumors were characterized by cytologically bland spindle cells with patternless growth, hypocellular and hypercellular areas, variable amounts of collagen, and ectatic, branching blood vessels. By immunohistochemistry, all cases had a strong nuclear STAT6 expression. All patients were initially managed with excision or biopsy, three with presurgical embolization. The two patients with biopsy only had persistent disease (mean 37.2 months), but a third patient developed distant bone metastasis at 86.9 months. Overall mean follow-up was 73.1 months: 9 patients are alive or dead without disease (mean 77.9 months), two patients with persistent disease, and one patient with metastatic disease at last follow-up (102 months). Incorporating cases sufficiently reported in the literature, a risk prediction model based on age > 45 years, tumor size > 3 cm, tumor necrosis, mitoses of > 4/2 mm

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOrbital NeoplasmsRisk FactorsSolitary Fibrous TumorsYoung AdultFollow-up studiesImmunohistochemistryOrbital neoplasmsRisk assessmentSolitary fibrous tumorsSTAT6

Identifiers

PMID32529350
PMCPMC8010011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.