Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32529349›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2020

Sex Differences in the Treatment of HIV.

Jennifer Cohn, Julie Ake, Michelle Moorhouse, Catherine Godfrey

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Loss to Follow-Up and Visit Nonadherence in an HIV Incidence Cohort in Kisumu, Kenya.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Hidden in plain sight: sex and gender in global pandemics.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer CohnRoute des Morillons, Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, Switzerland.
Julie AkeWalter Reed Army Institute of Research, Robert Grant Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA.
Michelle MoorhouseUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Kensington, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Catherine GodfreyOffice of the Global AIDS Coordinator, Washington, DC, 20003, USA. qea0@cdc.gov.
AIDS United · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewBiological and societal influences are different for men and women leading to different HIV outcomes and related infectious and non-infectious complications. This review evaluates sex differences in the epidemiology and immunological response to HIV and looks at major complications and coinfections, as well as care delivery systems focusing on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where most people with HIV live. RECENT

findingsMore women than men access testing and treatment services in LMIC; women are more likely to be virologically suppressed in that environment. There is a growing recognition that the enhanced immunological response to several pathogens including HIV may result in improved outcomes for infectious comorbidities but may result in a greater burden of non-communicable diseases. Men and women have different requirements for HIV care. Attention to these differences may improve outcomes for all.

Indexed as

ComorbidityDelivery of Health CareDeveloping CountriesFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMaleNoncommunicable DiseasesPovertySex FactorsHIVLMICSex differencesWomen

Identifiers

PMID32529349
OpenAlexW3035439429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.