Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32529339›Full record

ArticleAnatomical science international2021

A simplified fascial model of pelvic anatomical surgery: going beyond parametrium-centered surgical anatomy.

Stefano Cosma, Domenico Ferraioli, Marco Mitidieri, Marcello Ceccaroni, Paolo Zola, Leonardo Micheletti, Chiara Benedetto

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical science international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefano CosmaGynecology and Obstetrics 1, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, University of Torino, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126, Turin, Italy. stefano.cosma@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0563-0071
Domenico FerraioliDepartment of Oncology Surgery, Léon Bérard Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lyon, France.
Marco MitidieriGynecology and Obstetrics 4, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, City of Health and Science, Turin, Italy.
Marcello CeccaroniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Paolo ZolaGynecology and Obstetrics 2, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Leonardo MichelettiGynecology and Obstetrics 1, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, University of Torino, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Chiara BenedettoGynecology and Obstetrics 1, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, University of Torino, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon · FROspedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITPiedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classical surgical anatomy of the female pelvis is limited by its gynecological oncological focus on the parametrium and burdened by its modeling based on personal techniques of different surgeons. However, surgical treatment of pelvic diseases, spreading beyond the anatomical area of origin, requires extra-regional procedures and a thorough pelvic anatomical knowledge. This study evaluated the feasibility of a comprehensive and simplified model of pelvic retroperitoneal compartmentalization, based on anatomical rather than surgical anatomical structures. Such a model aims at providing an easier, holistic approach useful for clinical, surgical and educational purposes. Six fresh-frozen female pelves were macroscopically and systematically dissected. Three superficial structures, i.e., the obliterated umbilical artery, the ureter and the sacrouterine ligament, were identified as the landmarks of 3 deeper fascial-ligamentous structures, i.e., the umbilicovesical fascia, the urogenital-hypogastric fascia and the sacropubic ligament. The retroperitoneal areolar tissue was then gently teased away, exposing the compartments delimited by these deep fascial structures. Four compartments were identified as a result of the intrapelvic development of the umbilicovesical fascia along the obliterated umbilical artery, the urogenital-hypogastric fascia along the mesoureter and the sacropubic ligaments. The retroperitoneal compartments were named: parietal, laterally to the umbilicovesical fascia; vascular, between the two fasciae; neural, medially to the urogenital-hypogastric fascia and visceral between the sacropubic ligaments. The study provides the scientific rational for a model of pelvic retroperitoneal anatomy based on identifiable anatomical structures and suitable for surgical planning and training.

Indexed as

FasciotomyModels, AnatomicAnatomyFasciaFeasibility StudiesFemaleGeneral SurgeryHumansPelvisCompartmentsParametriumPararectal spaceParavesical spacePelvic retroperitoneum

Identifiers

PMID32529339
PMCPMC7806572
OpenAlexW3034311344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.