Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32529274›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

The Clinical Utility of Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) Serum Levels as a Biomarker for Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC).

Linde M van Veenendaal, Eduardo Bertolli, Catharina M Korse, W Martin C Klop, Margot E T Tesselaar, Alexander C J van Akkooi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. BeyondMolecular therapy oncolytics · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Linde M van VeenendaalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eduardo BertolliDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Catharina M KorseDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W Martin C KlopDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Margot E T TesselaarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexander C J van AkkooiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.v.akkooi@nki.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAC Camargo Hospital · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo adequate biomarker for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) has been identified. Serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) has been tested and is commonly used as a biomarker for several other small cell malignancies. However, the role of NSE in MCC is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of NSE as a biomarker in MCC.

methodsA prospective cohort of MCC patients was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test, ROC curves, Cox regression, and mixed models. A separate evaluation was performed for patients treated with immunotherapy.

resultsEighty-four patients were included [47 males, median age 71 years, stages I & II, III, and IV MCC in respectively 39 (46%), 42 (50%), and 4 (3%) patients at time of diagnosis] with 565 NSE samples (median 15; interquartile range 12.6-22 ng/ml). Baseline NSE had no association with prognosis. NSE correlated with extent of disease (P = 0.01) and increased with 15 ng/ml per class (no tumor load, localized MCC, regional or distant metastases, respectively). NSE was able to detect progression (AUC 0.89). A NSE of 18.2 ng/ml was considered the most optimal level for clinical use (sensitivity 91%, specificity 78%, PPV 48%, NPV 98%). During immunotherapy (N = 23; 248 NSE values), all complete responders (N = 10) had a normalized NSE (< 18.2 ng/ml), all partial responders (N = 5) had a decreasing NSE. In nonresponders (N = 8), all NSE levels remained elevated.

conclusionsNSE could be a valuable biomarker in MCC. NSE correlates with extent of disease; it is able to rule out progression and distinguishes responders from nonresponders during immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Merkel CellLung NeoplasmsSkin NeoplasmsAgedBiomarkersHumansMalePhosphopyruvate HydrataseProspective StudiesBiomarkersPhosphopyruvate Hydratase

Identifiers

PMID32529274
OpenAlexW3034676899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.