Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32529184›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2020

Unbiased analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells reveals CD4 T cell response to RSV matrix protein.

Juilee Thakar, Yu Qian, Lauren Benoodt, David Roumanes, Xing Qiu, Nathan Laniewski, ChinYi Chu, Christopher Slaunwhite, Lu Wang, Aishwarya Mandava and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juilee ThakarDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
Yu QianJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Lauren BenoodtDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
David RoumanesDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
Xing QiuDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
Nathan LaniewskiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
ChinYi ChuDivision of Neonatology and Pediatric Molecular and Personalized Medicine Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Christopher SlaunwhiteDivision of Neonatology and Pediatric Molecular and Personalized Medicine Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Lu WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
Aishwarya MandavaJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Ivan ChangJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Ann R FalseyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Mary T CasertaDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Thomas J MarianiDivision of Neonatology and Pediatric Molecular and Personalized Medicine Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Richard H ScheuermannJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Edward E WalshDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
David J TophamDavid H. Smith Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
University of Rochester · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USJ. Craig Venter Institute · US

Funding

VISUAL INDICES OF NEUROTOXICITYP30ES001247 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Martha Susiarjo · 1985 to 2026
$42.8M
The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILSON, KAREN M., ZAND, MARTIN S · 2016 to 2024
$34.6M
Infection and Immunity: The Pathogenesis of Host-Microbe InteractionsT32AI118689 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Paul M. Dunman, BRIAN M WARD · 2015 to 2026
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002001NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI118689NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES001247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most important cause of respiratory tract illness especially in young infants that develop severe disease requiring hospitalization, and accounting for 74,000-126,000 admissions in the United States (Rezaee et al., 2017; Resch, 2017). Observations of neonatal and infant T cells suggest that they may express different immune markers compared to T-cells from older children. Flow cytometry analysis of cellular responses using "conventional" anti-viral markers (IL2, IFN-γ, TNF, IL10 and IL4) upon RSV-peptide stimulation detected an overall low RSV response in peripheral blood. Therefore we sought an unbiased approach to identify RSV-specific immune markers using RNA-sequencing upon stimulation of infant PBMCs with overlapping peptides representing RSV antigens. To understand the cellular response using transcriptional signatures, transcription factors and cell-type specific signatures were used to investigate breadth of response across peptides. Unexpected from the ICS data, M peptide induced a response equivalent to the F-peptide and was characterized by activation of GATA2, 3, STAT3 and IRF1. This along with upregulation of several unconventional T cell signatures was only observed upon M-peptide stimulation. Moreover, signatures of natural RSV infections were identified from the data available in the public domain to investigate similarities between transcriptional signatures from PBMCs and upon peptide stimulation. This analysis also suggested activation of T cell response upon M-peptide stimulation. Hence, based on transcriptional response, markers were chosen to validate the role of M-peptide in activation of T cells. Indeed, CD4+CXCL9+ cells were identified upon M-peptide stimulation by flow cytometry. Future work using additional markers identified in this study could reveal additional unconventional T cells responding to RSV infections in infants. In conclusion, T cell responses to RSV in infants may not follow the canonical Th1/Th2 patterns of effector responses but include additional functions that may be unique to the neonatal period and correlate with clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

PBMCPeptide stimulationRSVTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID32529184
PMCPMC7280769
OpenAlexW3018295868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.