Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32529140›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Early Outcomes of Patients With Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: The Mayo Clinic Experience.

Nathan Y Yu, Todd A DeWees, Chenbin Liu, Thomas B Daniels, Jonathan B Ashman, Staci E Beamer, Dawn E Jaroszewski, Helen J Ross, Harshita R Paripati, Jean-Claude M Rwigema and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evidence-based indications for proton therapy in adults determined using the GRADE approach.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan Y YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Todd A DeWeesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Chenbin LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Thomas B DanielsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Jonathan B AshmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Staci E BeamerDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Dawn E JaroszewskiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Helen J RossDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Harshita R ParipatiDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Jean-Claude M RwigemaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Julia X DingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Jie ShanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Wei LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Steven E SchildDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Terence T SioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are very little data available comparing outcomes of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC).

methodsSeventy-nine consecutively treated patients with LA-NSCLC underwent definitive IMPT (

resultsMedian follow-up was 10.5 months (range, 1-27) for all surviving patients. Most were stage III (80%), received median radiation therapy (RT) dose of 60 Gy (range, 45-72), and had concurrent chemotherapy (65%). At baseline, the IMPT cohort was older (76 vs 69 years,

conclusionsCompared with IMRT, our early experience suggests that IMPT resulted in similar outcomes in a frailer population of LA-NSCLC who were more often being reirradiated. The role of IMPT remains to be defined prospectively.

Identifiers

PMID32529140
PMCPMC7276663
OpenAlexW2974830372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.