Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32529057›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2020

Preliminary screening of the aqueous extracts of twenty-three different seaweed species in Sri Lanka with

Amal D Premarathna, T H Ranahewa, S K Wijesekera, D L Harishchandra, K J K Karunathilake, Roshitha N Waduge, R R M K K Wijesundara, Anura P Jayasooriya, Viskam Wijewardana, R P V J Rajapakse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Black Sea-Derived Biomaterials for Wound-Healing Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Amal D PremarathnaDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
T H RanahewaDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
S K WijesekeraDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Open University, Kandy Regional Center, Polgolla, Sri Lanka.
D L HarishchandraDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
K J K KarunathilakeDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Roshitha N WadugeDepartment of Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
R R M K K WijesundaraDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Anura P JayasooriyaDepartment of Basic Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Viskam WijewardanaDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
R P V J RajapakseDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
University of Peradeniya · LKOpen University of Sri Lanka · LK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeaweeds are an important source of bioactive compounds which are applied in various aspects of medicinal investigations. The present study was conducted to investigate cytoxicity (

methodsTwenty-three seaweed samples, belonging to Phaeophyta (Brown), Chlorophyta (Green) and Rhodophyta (Red) were used for the experiments. Samples were collected from the inter-tidal and the sub-tidal habitats around Sri Lankan coast (Southern, Northern and North-western). Aqueous seaweed extracts were tested for cytotoxic and wound healing activity;

resultsPhytochemical tests showed positive results to flavonoids in all the selected green seaweeds and alkaloids were observed in red seaweeds. In the toxicity assay, red seaweed,

conclusionsAqueous extracts of selected seaweeds are a significant source of potential compounds with wound healing properties, which might be helpful in the healing of various wounds. This also infers that many species of brown and red seaweeds have the potential of wound healing, specifically,

Indexed as

Albino miceAlternative medicineAnimal behaviorBiochemistryBrine shrimpCell viabilityImmunologyL929Laboratory medicineMolecular biologym-RNA expressionPharmacologyPhytochemicalSeaweedsSurgeryTGF-βTNF-αToxicityToxicologyWound healing

Identifiers

PMID32529057
PMCPMC7283164
OpenAlexW3034169591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.