Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32529016›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2020

Gait Analysis Comparing Kinematic, Kinetic, and Muscle Activation Data of Modern and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Kojiro Hyodo, Akihiro Kanamori, Hideki Kadone, Tatsuya Takahashi, Masaya Kajiwara, Masashi Yamazaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Comparing kinematic and kinetic demands on the knee joint during selected physiotherapy exercises and activities of daily living.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kojiro HyodoFaculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Akihiro KanamoriFaculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hideki KadoneCenter for Innovative Medicine and Engineering, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Tatsuya TakahashiFaculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Masaya KajiwaraFaculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Masashi YamazakiFaculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
University of Tsukuba · JPUniversity of Tsukuba Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo provide normal knee function, a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant with an anatomic surface shape and an adequate sagittal position has been developed. However, it is unclear how this modern implant influences knee joint kinetics and muscle activation during a gait. Therefore, we evaluated this modern TKA prosthesis and compared it with a conventional TKA prosthesis for gait analysis in terms of kinetics and muscle activation.

methodsSubjects were patients (>60 years of age) with knee osteoarthritis who had undergone unilateral TKA. Twelve patients received the modern TKA prosthesis (group modern), and the other 12 patients received a conventional TKA prosthesis (group conventional). The subjects underwent motion capture analyses with a force plate, and kinematic and kinetic data were acquired from a 10-m gait test. Electromyography data of 6 lower limb muscles were simultaneously collected during the gait test. The 2 groups were compared using unpaired t-tests.

resultsIn group modern, gait speed was faster, step length was longer, and the knee flexion angle during the initial stance phase was larger. Furthermore, in group modern, the maximum knee extension moment was higher; however, the quadriceps muscle activity tended to be lower than that in group conventional.

conclusionsGait characteristics of group modern were more like a normal gait, and knee joint extension moments were greater. This finding indicates that the quadriceps muscles can be more effectively activated, and the anterior stability function of the anterior cruciate ligament may be reproduced with the shape of the modern implant.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyGait analysisKnee joint kineticsMotion capture systemTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID32529016
PMCPMC7280752
OpenAlexW3033953352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.