Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32528986›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Comparative Analysis of Tear Composition in Humans, Domestic Mammals, Reptiles, and Birds.

Ana Cláudia Raposo, Ricardo Dias Portela, Marcela Aldrovani, Thiago Doria Barral, Dayse Cury, Arianne Pontes Oriá

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mucosal immune responses toMarine life science & technology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The glycoproteomics of hawk and caiman tears.BMC veterinary research · 2021
    Article
  11. Tear Film Proteome of Healthy Domestic Cats.Veterinary medicine international · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Cláudia RaposoSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechny, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Ricardo Dias PortelaInstitute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Marcela AldrovaniPost-Graduation Program in Animal Science, Franca University, Franca, Brazil.
Thiago Doria BarralInstitute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Dayse CuryBrazilian Institute of Ophthalmology and Blindness Prevention, Bahia School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, Brazil.
Arianne Pontes OriáSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechny, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tears are an important component of the ocular surface protection mechanism and are in close contact with the corneal epithelium and the environment. Their composition is well-known in humans; however, there are few investigations on the composition and function of tears in reptiles, birds and others mammals, which would elucidate the mechanisms governing the maintenance of ocular homeostasis. In this work, electrophoretic profiles and an evaluation of total protein, albumin, urea, glucose, and cholesterol concentrations in tears of semi-aquatic, terrestrial, and marine reptiles (

Indexed as

cholesterolglucoseocular surfaceproteintear compositionurea

Identifiers

PMID32528986
PMCPMC7256680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.