Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32528910›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2020

Comparative study of bilateral axillo-breast approach endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy: propensity score matching analysis of large multi-institutional data.

June Young Choi, In Eui Bae, Hyun Soo Kim, Sang Gab Yoon, Jin Wook Yi, Hyeong Won Yu, Su-Jin Kim, Young Jun Chai, Kyu Eun Lee, Yeo-Kyu Youn

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Conversion rates in robotic thyroid surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

June Young ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9990-607X
In Eui BaeDepartment of Surgery, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9220-8815
Hyun Soo KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sang Gab YoonDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Wook YiDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9296-8443
Hyeong Won YuDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7338-5157
Su-Jin KimCancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5511-3596
Young Jun ChaiCancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8830-3433
Kyu Eun LeeCancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2354-3599
Yeo-Kyu YounYeo-Kyu Youn Thyroid Clinic, St. Peter's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2349-4624
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRKonyang University Hospital · KRSt. Peter's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to compare the large multi-institutional data of surgical outcomes of bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) robotic (RT) and endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET) and to evaluate the merits of robotic thyroidectomy.

methodsFrom 2004 to 2015, 1,029 patients underwent BABA ET, and from 2008 to 2015, 2003 patients underwent BABA RT in 3 large volume centers in Korea. Two groups were retrospectively compared in terms of clinicopathologic characteristics, complications, surgical completeness, and long-term outcomes using propensity score matching analysis.

resultsBoth groups had similar demographic characteristics including age, sex, tumor size, pathologic stage, and hospital stay after matching. Each group had similar rate of transient hypoparathyroidism, however, ET showed significantly higher rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism (ET 5.2%

conclusionBoth ET and RT can be safe and effective methods to treat thyroid diseases. However, the application of robotic system may help to overcome the limitations of the instruments and surgeon's skills.

Indexed as

Minimally Invasive surgical proceduresPropensity scoreRobotic surgical proceduresThyroidectomy

Identifiers

PMID32528910
PMCPMC7263885
OpenAlexW3031377430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.