Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32528822›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2020

Location and duration of secondhand smoke exposure among Minnesota Nonsmokers, 2018.

Ann W St Claire, Samantha Friedrichsen, Raymond G Boyle, John Kingsbury, Michael J Parks, Sharrilyn Helgertz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Where Do Smokers in Singapore Smoke? A Latent Class Analysis to Classify Smokers Based On Smoking Location.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ann W St ClaireClearWay Minnesota 8011 34th Ave South, Suite 400, Minneapolis, MN 55425, United States.
Samantha FriedrichsenProfessional Data Analysts 219 Main Street SE, Suite 302, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States.
Raymond G BoyleUniversity of California, Office of the President, 300 Lakeside Drive, 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612, United States.
John KingsburyMinnesota Department of Health, PO Box 64975, St. Paul, MN 55164, United States.
Michael J ParksMinnesota Department of Health, PO Box 64975, St. Paul, MN 55164, United States.
Sharrilyn HelgertzMinnesota Department of Health, PO Box 64975, St. Paul, MN 55164, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2007 Minnesota passed into law a comprehensive ban on indoor smoking of tobacco products in public places including bars, restaurants, and workplaces. Despite reductions in smoking prevalence in the past 12 years, people are still exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS). It remains important to understand where and how long nonsmokers face exposure to SHS. The 2018 Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey was analyzed to examine self-reported SHS exposure among nonsmoking adults. We report prevalence and 95 percent confidence intervals of SHS exposure overall, by specific locations, and by demographics. Length of exposure to SHS was summarized in median minutes. Overall, 30 percent of nonsmokers reported exposure in the past seven days. A total of 1382 participants indicated a location of exposure. The most common locations other than one's own home or car included building entrances (18.7 [16.2-21.1] percent), somewhere else outdoors (17.7 [15.1-20.3] percent), and restaurant/bar patios (12.8 [10.5-15.0] percent). Exposure was more likely to be reported by young adults (44.6 percent) and males (33.7 percent). The locations with the longest duration of SHS exposure in the prior seven days were a gambling venue (117.2 [72.2-162.2] minutes), another person's home (26.1 [15.4-36.8] minutes), and a bus stop (10.8 [4.7-16.9] minutes). Monitoring nonsmokers' self-reported exposure to SHS remains important as a way to measure the impact and compliance with smoke-free policies. Additional information on the location and duration of exposure can be used programmatically to address high levels of exposure and consider additional policies or strategies.

Indexed as

Secondhand smokeSmoke-free policySurveillance

Identifiers

PMID32528822
PMCPMC7280764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.