Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32528818›Full record

ArticleOsong public health and research perspectives2020

Detection of Novel Coronavirus on the Surface of Environmental Materials Contaminated by COVID-19 Patients in the Republic of Korea.

Sang-Eun Lee, Deog-Yong Lee, Wook-Gyo Lee, ByeongHak Kang, Yoon Suk Jang, Boyeong Ryu, SeungJae Lee, Hyunjung Bahk, Eungyu Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osong public health and research perspectives, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. [Is Disinfection of Public Surfaces useful for the Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 Infections?]Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sang-Eun LeeCenter for Laboratory Control of Infectious Diseases, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chungju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2114-579X
Deog-Yong LeeCenter for Laboratory Control of Infectious Diseases, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chungju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4481-4789
Wook-Gyo LeeCenter for Laboratory Control of Infectious Diseases, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chungju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3765-6391
ByeongHak KangCenter for Laboratory Control of Infectious Diseases, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chungju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1952-0965
Yoon Suk JangCenter for Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chungju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0527-8071
Boyeong RyuCenter for Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chungju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9336-8098
SeungJae LeeCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chungju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4899-1344
Hyunjung BahkCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chungju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6597-0564
Eungyu LeeNational Center for Medical Information and Knowledge, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chungju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0848-1921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the presence of SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces frequently touched by COVID-19 patients, and assess the scope of contamination and transmissibility in facilities where the outbreaks occurred. In the course of this epidemiological investigation, a total of 80 environmental specimens were collected from 6 hospitals (68 specimens) and 2 "mass facilities" (6 specimens from a rehabilitation center and 6 specimens from an apartment building complex). Specific reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction targeting of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, and envelope genes, were used to identify the presence of this novel coronavirus. The 68 specimens from 6 hospitals (A, B, C, D, E, and G), where prior disinfection/cleaning had been performed before environmental sampling, tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. However, 2 out of 12 specimens (16.7%) from 2 "mass facilities" (F and H), where prior disinfection/cleaning had not taken place, were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA polymerase, and envelope genes. These results suggest that prompt disinfection and cleaning of potentially contaminated surfaces is an effective infection control measure. By inactivating SARS-CoV-2 with disinfection/cleaning the infectivity and transmission of the virus is blocked. This investigation of environmental sampling may help in the understanding of risk assessment of the COVID-19 outbreak in "mass facilities" and provide guidance in using effective disinfectants on contaminated surfaces.

Indexed as

COVID-19disinfectionenvironmental sampleRepublic of Korea

Identifiers

PMID32528818
PMCPMC7282419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.