Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32528794›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2020

AOSpine Consensus Paper on Nomenclature for Working-Channel Endoscopic Spinal Procedures.

Christoph P Hofstetter, Yong Ahn, Gun Choi, J N A Gibson, S Ruetten, Yue Zhou, Zhen Zhou Li, Christoph J Siepe, Ralf Wagner, Jun-Ho Lee and 18 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 79 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Minimally invasive endoscopy in spine surgery: where are we now?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Christoph P HofstetterUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-950X
Yong AhnGachon University, Incheon, South Korea.
Gun ChoiWooridul Spine Hospital, Pohang, South Korea.
J N A GibsonSpire Murrayfield Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
S RuettenCenter for Spine Surgery and Pain Therapy, Center for Orthopedics and Traumatology of the St. Elisabeth Group-Catholic Hospital Rhein-Ruhr, St. Anna Hospital Herne/Marien Hospital Herne University Hospital of the Ruhr University of Bochum/Marien Hospital Witten, Herne, Germany.
Yue ZhouXinquiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongquing, China.
Zhen Zhou LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Christoph J SiepeSchön Clinic Munich Harlaching, Munich, Germany.
Ralf WagnerLigamenta Spine Center, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jun-Ho LeeKyung Hee University Medical Centre, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6246-8053
Koichi SairyoThe University of Tokushima, Tokushima, Japan.
Kyung Chul ChoiThe Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Anyang, South Korea.
Chien-Min ChenChanghua Christian Hospital, Changhua, and Dayeh University, Changhua.
A E TelfeianRhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown, Providence, RI, USA.
Xifeng ZhangThe General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.
Arun BanhotColumbia Asia Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Pramod V LokhandeSKN Medical College, Pune, India.
N PradaFoscal International Clinic, Floridablanca, Colombia.
Jian ShenMohawk Valley Orthopedics, Amsterdam, NY, USA.
F C CortinasHospital Angeles Pedregal Camino Santa Teresa, Mexico City, Mexico.
N P BrooksUniversity of Wisconsin, Maddison, WI, USA.
Peter Van DaeleO.L.V. van Lourdes Ziekenhuis, Waregem, Belgium.
Vit KotheeranurakQueen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Sriracha, Chonburi, Thailand.
Saqib HasanRamathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Gun KeorochanaRamathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mohammed AssousRazi Spine Clinic-Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Amman, Jordan.
Roger HärtlWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Jin-Sung KimSt. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designInternational consensus paper on a unified nomenclature for full-endoscopic spine surgery.

objectivesMinimally invasive endoscopic spinal procedures have undergone rapid development during the past decade. Evolution of working-channel endoscopes and surgical instruments as well as innovation in surgical techniques have expanded the types of spinal pathology that can be addressed. However, there is in the literature a heterogeneous nomenclature defining approach corridors and procedures, and this lack of common language has hampered communication between endoscopic spine surgeons, patients, hospitals, and insurance providers.

methodsThe current report summarizes the nomenclature reported for working-channel endoscopic procedures that address cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal pathology.

resultsWe propose a uniform system that defines the working-channel endoscope (full-endoscopic), approach corridor (anterior, posterior, interlaminar, transforaminal), spinal segment (cervical, thoracic, lumbar), and procedure performed (eg, discectomy, foraminotomy). We suggest the following nomenclature for the most common full-endoscopic procedures: posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (PECF), transforaminal endoscopic thoracic discectomy (TETD), transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD), transforaminal lumbar foraminotomy (TELF), interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD), interlaminar endoscopic lateral recess decompression (IE-LRD), and lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (LE-ULBD).

conclusionsWe believe that it is critical to delineate a consensus nomenclature to facilitate uniformity of working-channel endoscopic procedures within academic scholarship. This will hopefully facilitate development, standardization of procedures, teaching, and widespread acceptance of full-endoscopic spinal procedures.

Indexed as

consensusfull-endoscopic spine surgeryinterlaminarlateral recess decompressionminimally invasive spinal surgerynomenclaturetransforaminalworking-channel endoscope

Identifiers

PMID32528794
PMCPMC7263337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.