Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32528759›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Assisting Vascular Surgery with Smartphone Augmented Reality.

Omar Aly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Omar AlyGeneral Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Augmented reality is a technology that expands on image-guided surgery to allow intraoperative guidance and navigation. Augmented reality-assisted surgery (ARAS) has not been implemented in the vascular field yet. The wealth of sensors found on modern smartphones make them a promising platform for implementing vascular ARAS. However, current smartphone augmented reality platforms suffer from tracking instability, making them unsuitable for precise surgery. Novel algorithms need to be developed to tackle the stability and performance limitations of mobile phone augmented reality. Aim The primary aim was to develop an ARAS system utilizing low-cost smartphone hardware for vascular surgery. The second aim was to assess its performance by evaluating the stability of its tracking algorithms. Methods We designed an ARAS system utilizing standard optical tracking (SOT) and developed a novel tracking algorithm: hybrid gyroscopic and optical tracking (HGOT) for improved tracking stability. We evaluated the stability of both tracking algorithms using a phantom model and calculated tracking errors using root mean square error (RMSE).  Results The novel augmented reality system displayed a three-dimensional (3D) guidance model fused with the patient's anatomy on a smartphone in real-time. The rotational tracking RMSE was 3.12 degrees for SOT and 0.091 degrees for HGOT. Positional tracking RMSE was 3.3 mm for SOT compared to 0.03 mm for HGOT. Comparing the stability of both tracking techniques showed HGOT to be significantly superior to SOT (p = 0.004). Conclusion We have developed a novel augmented reality system for vascular procedures. The development of HGOT has significantly increased the stability of a low-cost handheld augmented reality solution.

Indexed as

augmented realityimage-guided radiosurgeryperipheral arterial diseasesthree-dimensional (3d) printing

Identifiers

PMID32528759
PMCPMC7282367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.