ArticleCureus2020
Assisting Vascular Surgery with Smartphone Augmented Reality.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Needle Guide on Smartphone for Percutaneous Interventions Using Augmented Reality.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- Smartphone Technology for Applications in Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Interventional Procedures.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Review
- Augmented Reality in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: Scoping Review.JMIR serious games · 2022Article
- Augmented Reality-Based Visual Cue for Guiding Central Catheter Insertion in Pediatric Oncologic Patients.World journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Bioengineering, augmented reality, and robotic surgery in vascular surgery: A literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Smartphone-based imaging systems for medical applications: a critical review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Augmented reality is a technology that expands on image-guided surgery to allow intraoperative guidance and navigation. Augmented reality-assisted surgery (ARAS) has not been implemented in the vascular field yet. The wealth of sensors found on modern smartphones make them a promising platform for implementing vascular ARAS. However, current smartphone augmented reality platforms suffer from tracking instability, making them unsuitable for precise surgery. Novel algorithms need to be developed to tackle the stability and performance limitations of mobile phone augmented reality. Aim The primary aim was to develop an ARAS system utilizing low-cost smartphone hardware for vascular surgery. The second aim was to assess its performance by evaluating the stability of its tracking algorithms. Methods We designed an ARAS system utilizing standard optical tracking (SOT) and developed a novel tracking algorithm: hybrid gyroscopic and optical tracking (HGOT) for improved tracking stability. We evaluated the stability of both tracking algorithms using a phantom model and calculated tracking errors using root mean square error (RMSE). Results The novel augmented reality system displayed a three-dimensional (3D) guidance model fused with the patient's anatomy on a smartphone in real-time. The rotational tracking RMSE was 3.12 degrees for SOT and 0.091 degrees for HGOT. Positional tracking RMSE was 3.3 mm for SOT compared to 0.03 mm for HGOT. Comparing the stability of both tracking techniques showed HGOT to be significantly superior to SOT (p = 0.004). Conclusion We have developed a novel augmented reality system for vascular procedures. The development of HGOT has significantly increased the stability of a low-cost handheld augmented reality solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.