Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32528754›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Integrating Survivorship Care Into a Radiation Medicine Program.

Shaziya Malam, Belinda Lawrence, Cari Bradley, Kimberly M McBride, Ashley Clement, Tatiana Conrad, M Cheryl Noronha, Jeanette K Wong, Rachel A Woo, Zahra Kassam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shaziya MalamRadiation Oncology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, CAN.
Belinda LawrenceRadiation Oncology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, CAN.
Cari BradleyRadiation Oncology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, CAN.
Kimberly M McBrideRadiation Oncology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, CAN.
Ashley ClementRadiation Oncology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, CAN.
Tatiana ConradRadiation Oncology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, CAN.
M Cheryl NoronhaRadiation Oncology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, CAN.
Jeanette K WongRadiation Oncology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, CAN.
Rachel A WooRadiation Oncology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, CAN.
Zahra KassamRadiation Oncology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction An important but often overlooked component of caring for cancer patients is survivorship care, provided after the completion of active treatment in order to facilitate transition into the next surveillance phase. A survivorship program was developed to deliver a one-on-one education session on healthy lifestyle behaviours and available resources to help patients transition to their post-treatment life. This study reports the outcome of this pilot survivorship care program provided to breast cancer patients completing radiation therapy. Program delivery format and content were evaluated for effectiveness, applicability, and feasibility.  Methods and materials Between March 2017 and August 2018, 124 breast cancer patients, nearing completion of their curative intent radiation treatments, participated in this centre-specific survivorship program. The survivorship program entailed a one on one education session delivered to breast cancer patients within the last two weeks of their radiation treatment. Participants were provided a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation, information pamphlet, and evaluation form to provide feedback on materials and presentation. Survivorship education sessions were delivered by study staff or staff scheduled in the Pre-Radiotherapy Patient Assessment role. Follow-up phone calls were conducted post-session delivery to determine the ongoing applicability of survivorship material. Staff was also given an evaluation form upon completion of the trial to measure the session feasibility. Results Of the 124 participants in the study, 69 (56%) provided feedback. Results showed that 98% of participants felt the information provided either confirmed what they were already doing (44%) or encouraged them to consider a lifestyle change (54%). Additionally, 70% reported feeling more confident after completing the session. Staff survey results reported that 87.5% agreed or strongly agreed that these sessions were beneficial and valuable to patients Conclusions Delivering one-on-one education sessions to individual participants focusing on healthy lifestyle measures garnered a positive response from participants, increasing their confidence and knowledge for making lifestyle changes. While staff survey results pointed strongly in favour of continuing with the survivorship sessions, it was shown that the methods of delivery trialed in this study were not feasible to be implemented on a larger scale. With some workflow modification, implementing a survivorship care program in our cancer centre is a possible and important aspect of a patient's treatment journey.

Indexed as

cancereducationradiation therapysurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID32528754
PMCPMC7279678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.