ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Study of Enzyme Inhibition.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- A Facile and Reproducible Method for the Purification of Peptide- and Protein-Functionalized DNA Nanostructures.JACS Au · 2025Article
- Pursuing excitonic energy transfer with programmable DNA-based optical breadboards.Chemical Society reviews · 2023Review
- Nucleic acid nanostructures forApplied physics reviews · 2023Review
- Reverse engineering DNA origami nanostructure designs from raw scaffold and staple sequence lists.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Adenita: interactive 3D modelling and visualization of DNA nanostructures.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Robotic DNA Nanostructures.ACS synthetic biology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rise of material science and nanotechnology created a demand for a next generation of materials and procedures that can transcend the shaping of simple geometrical nano-objects. As a legacy of the technological progress made in the Human Genome Project, DNA was identified as a possible candidate. The low production costs of custom-made DNA molecules and the possibilities concerning the structural manipulation triggered significant advances in the field of DNA nanotechnology in the last decade. To facilitate the development of new DNA nanostructures and provide users an insight in less intuitive complexities and physical properties of the DNA folding, several
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.