Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32528482›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2020

From Lab to Field: Role of Humic Substances Under Open-Field and Greenhouse Conditions as Biostimulant and Biocontrol Agent.

Keiji Jindo, Fábio Lopes Olivares, Deyse Jacqueline da Paixão Malcher, Miguel Angel Sánchez-Monedero, Corné Kempenaar, Luciano Pasqualoto Canellas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
19.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A New Method for Discovering Plant Biostimulants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Molecular Insights into Abiotic Stresses in Mango.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Humic Acid-Coated FePolymers · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Keiji JindoAgrosystems Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Fábio Lopes OlivaresNúcleo de Desenvolvimento de Insumos Biológicos para a Agricultura (NUDIBA), Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, UENF, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Deyse Jacqueline da Paixão MalcherNúcleo de Desenvolvimento de Insumos Biológicos para a Agricultura (NUDIBA), Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, UENF, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Miguel Angel Sánchez-MonederoDepartment of Soil and Water Conservation and Organic Waste Management, Centro de Edafolog a y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS)-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient ficas (CSIC), Campus Universitario de Espinardo, Murcia, Spain.
Corné KempenaarAgrosystems Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Luciano Pasqualoto CanellasNúcleo de Desenvolvimento de Insumos Biológicos para a Agricultura (NUDIBA), Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, UENF, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
State University of Norte Fluminense · BRWageningen University & Research · NLCentro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demand for biostimulants has been growing at an annual rate of 10 and 12.4% in Europe and Northern America, respectively. The beneficial effects of humic substances (HS) as biostimulants of plant growth have been well-known since the 1980s, and they can be supportive to a circular economy if they are extracted from different renewable resources of organic matter including harvest residues, wastewater, sewage sludge, and manure. This paper presents an overview of the scientific outputs on application methods of HS in different conditions. Firstly, the functionality of HS in the primary and secondary metabolism under stressed and non-stressed cropping conditions is discussed along with crop protection against pathogens. Secondly, the advantages and limitations of five different types of HS application under open-fields and greenhouse conditions are described. Key factors, such as the chemical structure of HS, application method, optimal rate, and field circumstances, play a crucial role in enhancing plant growth by HS treatment as a biostimulant. If we can get a better grip on these factors, HS has the potential to become a part of circular agriculture.

Indexed as

circular economyfertigationfoliar applicationfulvic acidhumic acidsustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID32528482
PMCPMC7247854
OpenAlexW3025724171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.