SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2020
The Facial Action Coding System for Characterization of Human Affective Response to Consumer Product-Based Stimuli: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Sentinel Sleep Theory: Unweaving the biological function of REM sleep.Sleep medicine: X · 2026Article
- A multimodal drowsiness dataset using video, biometric, and behavioral data.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Article
- Facial mimicry predicts preference.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Drink and be merry? The impact of intoxication and affective social cues on social drinkers' emotional responses.Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire) · 2025Article
- Recognition of Basic Emotions Through Facial Expressions in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.Revista de neurologia · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- The neurobiological basis of emotions and their connection to facial expressions in non-human mammals: insights in nonverbal communication.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- Initial expressed emotion during neuropsychological assessment: investigating motivational dimensions of approach and avoidance.Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology · 2024Article
- Neurobiology and Anatomy of Facial Expressions in Great Apes: Application of the AnimalFACS and Its Possible Association with the Animal's Affective State.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- Defining Standard Values for FaceReader Facial Expression Software Output.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Emotional event perception is related to lexical complexity and emotion knowledge.Communications psychology · 2023Article
- Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of facial units in virtual smiling facial images with different smile expressions.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Evaluation: A Study of Facial Rejuvenation Techniques.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2023Article
- Real-time emotion generation in human-robot dialogue using large language models.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Article
- A Review of Multi-Modal Learning from the Text-Guided Visual Processing Viewpoint.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Personalized treatment - which interaction ingredients should be focused to capture the unconscious.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Review
- Evaluating the accuracy of facial expressions as emotion indicators across contexts in dogs.Animal cognition · 2022Article
- Eye-Tracker Study of Influence of Affective Disruptive Content on User's Visual Attention and Emotional State.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To characterize human emotions, researchers have increasingly utilized Automatic Facial Expression Analysis (AFEA), which automates the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) and translates the facial muscular positioning into the basic universal emotions. There is broad interest in the application of FACS for assessing consumer expressions as an indication of emotions to consumer product-stimuli. However, the translation of FACS to characterization of emotions is elusive in the literature. The aim of this systematic review is to give an overview of how FACS has been used to investigate human emotional behavior to consumer product-based stimuli. The search was limited to studies published in English after 1978, conducted on humans, using FACS or its action units to investigate affect, where emotional response is elicited by consumer product-based stimuli evoking at least one of the five senses. The search resulted in an initial total of 1,935 records, of which 55 studies were extracted and categorized based on the outcomes of interest including (i) method of FACS implementation; (ii) purpose of study; (iii) consumer product-based stimuli used; and (iv) measures of affect validation. Most studies implemented FACS manually (73%) to develop products and/or software (20%) and used consumer product-based stimuli that had known and/or defined capacity to evoke a particular affective response, such as films and/or movie clips (20%); minimal attention was paid to consumer products with low levels of emotional competence or with unknown affective impact. The vast majority of studies (53%) did not validate FACS-determined affect and, of the validation measures that were used, most tended to be discontinuous in nature and only captured affect as it holistically related to an experience. This review illuminated some inconsistencies in how FACS is carried out as well as how emotional response is inferred from facial muscle activation. This may prompt researchers to consider measuring the total consumer experience by employing a variety of methodologies in addition to FACS and its emotion-based interpretation guide. Such strategies may better conceptualize consumers' experience with products of low, unknown, and/or undefined capacity to evoke an affective response such as product prototypes, line extensions, etc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.