ArticleOncogene2020
Decoding whole-genome mutational signatures in 37 human pan-cancers by denoising sparse autoencoder neural network.
Article in Oncogene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immune, metabolic landscapes of prognostic signatures for lung adenocarcinoma based on a novel deep learning framework.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Model selection and robust inference of mutational signatures using Negative Binomial non-negative matrix factorization.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Construction of Home Product Design System Based on Self-Encoder Depth Neural Network.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- DeepFun: a deep learning sequence-based model to decipher non-coding variant effect in a tissue- and cell type-specific manner.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- DeepVISP: Deep Learning for Virus Site Integration Prediction and Motif Discovery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Article
- A Cluster-Based Approach for the Discovery of Copy Number Variations From Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Integrated Analysis of Whole Genome and Epigenome Data Using Machine Learning Technology: Toward the Establishment of Precision Oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Signatures of Discriminative Copy Number Aberrations in 31 Cancer Subtypes.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Millions of somatic mutations have recently been discovered in cancer genomes. These mutations in cancer genomes occur due to internal and external mutagenesis forces. Decoding the mutational processes by examining their unique patterns has successfully revealed many known and novel signatures from whole exome data, but many still remain undiscovered. Here, we developed a deep learning approach, DeepMS, to decompose mutational signatures using 52,671,908 somatic mutations from 2780 highly curated cancer genomes with whole genome sequencing (WGS) in 37 cancer types/subtypes. With rigorous model training and comparison, we characterized 54 signatures for single base substitutions (SBSs), 11 for doublet base substitutions (DBSs) and 16 for small insertions and deletions (Indels). Compared to the previous methods, DeepMS could discover 37 SBS, 5 DBS, and 9 Indel new signatures, many of which represent associations with DNA mismatch or base excision repair and cisplatin therapy mechanisms. We further developed a regression-based model to estimate the correlation between signatures and clinical and demographical phenotypes. The first deep learning model DeepMS on WGS somatic mutational profiles enable us identify more comprehensive context-based mutational signatures than traditional NMF approaches. Our work substantially expands the landscape of the naturally occurring mutational signatures in cancer genomes, and provides new insights into cancer biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.