Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32528130›Full record

ArticleOncogene2020

Decoding whole-genome mutational signatures in 37 human pan-cancers by denoising sparse autoencoder neural network.

Guangsheng Pei, Ruifeng Hu, Yulin Dai, Zhongming Zhao, Peilin Jia

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DeepVISP: Deep Learning for Virus Site Integration Prediction and Motif Discovery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guangsheng PeiCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1804-7598
Ruifeng HuCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5549-3082
Yulin DaiCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1874-7893
Zhongming ZhaoCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. zhongming.zhao@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3477-0914
Peilin JiaCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. peilin.jia@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4523-4153
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Transforming dbGaP genetic and genomic data to FAIR-ready by artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithmsR01LM012806 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Zhongming Zhao · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of somatic mutations have recently been discovered in cancer genomes. These mutations in cancer genomes occur due to internal and external mutagenesis forces. Decoding the mutational processes by examining their unique patterns has successfully revealed many known and novel signatures from whole exome data, but many still remain undiscovered. Here, we developed a deep learning approach, DeepMS, to decompose mutational signatures using 52,671,908 somatic mutations from 2780 highly curated cancer genomes with whole genome sequencing (WGS) in 37 cancer types/subtypes. With rigorous model training and comparison, we characterized 54 signatures for single base substitutions (SBSs), 11 for doublet base substitutions (DBSs) and 16 for small insertions and deletions (Indels). Compared to the previous methods, DeepMS could discover 37 SBS, 5 DBS, and 9 Indel new signatures, many of which represent associations with DNA mismatch or base excision repair and cisplatin therapy mechanisms. We further developed a regression-based model to estimate the correlation between signatures and clinical and demographical phenotypes. The first deep learning model DeepMS on WGS somatic mutational profiles enable us identify more comprehensive context-based mutational signatures than traditional NMF approaches. Our work substantially expands the landscape of the naturally occurring mutational signatures in cancer genomes, and provides new insights into cancer biology.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDNAGenome, HumanHumansINDEL MutationNeoplasmsPoint MutationDNA

Identifiers

PMID32528130
PMCPMC7334101
OpenAlexW3034303830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.