Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32528123›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Geometry and evolution of the ecological niche in plant-associated microbes.

Thomas M Chaloner, Sarah J Gurr, Daniel P Bebber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Novel Plant-Derived Biopesticide MitigatesPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mechanistic models to meet the challenge of climate change in plant-pathogen systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas M ChalonerDepartment of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QJ, UK.
Sarah J GurrDepartment of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4821-0635
Daniel P BebberDepartment of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QJ, UK. d.bebber@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4440-1482

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009122/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N020847/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ecological niche can be thought of as a volume in multidimensional space, where each dimension describes an abiotic condition or biotic resource required by a species. The shape, size, and evolution of this volume strongly determine interactions among species and influence their current and potential geographical distributions, but the geometry of niches is poorly understood. Here, we analyse temperature response functions and host plant ranges for hundreds of potentially destructive plant-associated fungi and oomycetes. We demonstrate that niche specialization is uncorrelated on abiotic (i.e. temperature response) and biotic (i.e. host range) axes, that host interactions restrict fundamental niche breadth to form the realized niche, and that both abiotic and biotic niches show limited phylogenetic constraint. The ecological terms 'generalist' and 'specialist' therefore do not apply to these microbes, as specialization evolves independently on different niche axes. This adaptability makes plant pathogens a formidable threat to agriculture and forestry.

Indexed as

EcosystemFungiPhylogenyPlants

Identifiers

PMID32528123
PMCPMC7289842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.