ArticleNature communications2020
Diagnostic evaluation of a deep learning model for optical diagnosis of colorectal cancer.
Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Convolutional Neural Network in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps and Cancer.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023Pooled it
- The Role of Computational Models in the Detection of Colorectal Carcinoma and Precancerous Lesions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A Comprehensive Cross-Cancer Translational Readiness Analysis Across 18 Malignancies.Cancers · 2026Review
- AI-powered hierarchical classification of ampullary neoplasms: a deep learning approach using white-light and narrow-band imaging.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Flexible, stretchable, on-chip optical tweezers for high-throughput bioparticle manipulation.Light, science & applications · 2026Article
- Colorectal Lesion diagnosis using transformer and deep learning with multiscale feature interface.PloS one · 2026Article
- Multiview deep-learning-enabled histopathology for prognostic and therapeutic stratification in stage II colorectal cancer: A retrospective multicenter study.PLoS medicine · 2026Observational
- Exploring the Impact of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Intraoperative Image Navigation System in Laparoscopic Surgery on Clinical Outcomes: A Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes · 2026Article
- Precision Oncology: Current Landscape, Emerging Trends, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Cells · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in cancer: applications, challenges, and future perspectives.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Article
- DeepGut: A collaborative multimodal large language model framework for digestive disease assisted diagnosis and treatment.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- Identification of colorectal malignancies enabled by phasor-based autofluorescence lifetime macroimaging and ensemble learning.Biophotonics discovery · 2025Article
- Directional white-light emission from sintered carbon dot titanium dioxide structures based on near-field confinement.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Yield of Combining CT Colonoscopy and Endoscopy to Investigate Colorectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- The relationship between epigenetic biomarkers and the risk of diabetes and cancer: a machine learning modeling approach.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- NMB promotes the progression of colorectal cancer by regulating the NF-κB/P65 signaling pathway.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- From theory to practice: Harmonizing taxonomies of trustworthy AI.Health policy OPEN · 2024Article
- Improving the endoscopic recognition of early colorectal carcinoma using artificial intelligence: current evidence and future directions.Endoscopy international open · 2024Review
- Advancing precise diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma through endoscopy-based radiomics analysis.iScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Colonoscopy is commonly used to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC). We develop a deep learning model called CRCNet for optical diagnosis of CRC by training on 464,105 images from 12,179 patients and test its performance on 2263 patients from three independent datasets. At the patient-level, CRCNet achieves an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.882 (95% CI: 0.828-0.931), 0.874 (0.820-0.926) and 0.867 (0.795-0.923). CRCNet exceeds average endoscopists performance on recall rate across two test sets (91.3% versus 83.8%; two-sided t-test, p < 0.001 and 96.5% versus 90.3%; p = 0.006) and precision for one test set (93.7% versus 83.8%; p = 0.02), while obtains comparable recall rate on one test set and precision on the other two. At the image-level, CRCNet achieves an AUPRC of 0.990 (0.987-0.993), 0.991 (0.987-0.995), and 0.997 (0.995-0.999). Our study warrants further investigation of CRCNet by prospective clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.