Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32528037›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Transcriptome analyses suggest that changes in fungal endophyte lifestyle could be involved in grapevine bud necrosis.

Thales Henrique Cherubino Ribeiro, Christiane Noronha Fernandes-Brum, Claudia Rita de Souza, Frederico Alcantara Novelli Dias, Osmar de Almeida-Junior, Murilo de Albuquerque Regina, Kellen Kauanne Pimenta de Oliveira, Gabriel Lasmar Dos Reis, Larissa Maia Oliveira, Fernanda de Paula Fernandes and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The core fungal microbiome of banana (Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Sucrose Utilization for Improved Crop Yields: A Review Article.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thales Henrique Cherubino RibeiroLaboratory of Molecular Plant Physiology, Department of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2675-7004
Christiane Noronha Fernandes-BrumLaboratory of Molecular Plant Physiology, Department of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Brazil.
Claudia Rita de SouzaTechnological Center of Grape and Wine Research, Agronomical Research Institute of Minas Gerais, Caldas, Brazil.
Frederico Alcantara Novelli DiasTechnological Center of Grape and Wine Research, Agronomical Research Institute of Minas Gerais, Caldas, Brazil.
Osmar de Almeida-JuniorCoordination of Integral Technical Assistance of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Murilo de Albuquerque ReginaTechnological Center of Grape and Wine Research, Agronomical Research Institute of Minas Gerais, Caldas, Brazil.
Kellen Kauanne Pimenta de OliveiraLaboratory of Molecular Plant Physiology, Department of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Brazil.
Gabriel Lasmar Dos ReisLaboratory of Molecular Plant Physiology, Department of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Brazil.
Larissa Maia OliveiraDepartment of Phytopathology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Brazil.
Fernanda de Paula FernandesTechnological Center of Grape and Wine Research, Agronomical Research Institute of Minas Gerais, Caldas, Brazil.
Laurent TorregrosaMontpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Jorge Teodoro de SouzaDepartment of Phytopathology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Brazil.
Antonio Chalfun-JuniorLaboratory of Molecular Plant Physiology, Department of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Brazil. chalfunjunior@ufla.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-9429
Universidade Federal de Lavras · BRAgronomical Institute of Campinas · BRAssociation of the Technological Integrated Systems Laboratory · BRInstitut Agro Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bud necrosis (BN) is a common disorder that affects Vitis vinifera L. and reduces its potential yield. To minimize the losses caused by BN, the double pruning management was applied in Brazilian Southeast vineyards. In this management strategy plants are pruned at the winter to promote a vegetative cycle and then, at summer, to promote the reproductive cycle at optimal environmental conditions. To investigate the relationship of BN and the double pruning management RNA-seq libraries were sequenced from healthy and necrotic tissues at four different stages of the year. The comparison of differentially expressed genes in necrotic and non-necrotic tissues showed an enhanced expression of genes related to cell death possibly induced by endophytic microorganisms in the necrotic tissues. The de novo assembly, characterization and quantification of transcripts within the RNA-seq libraries showed that genes from the endophytic fungus Alternaria alternata, responsible for the production of toxic compounds were highly expressed under BN. Here we propose a model in which unfavorable conditions and reduced carbohydrate levels in buds can promote the switch from a biotrophic lifestyle to a necrotrophic lifestyle in the endophytic fungi, which seems to be involved in the development of BN.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAlternariaEndophytesNecrosisPlant DiseasesPlant ShootsReproductionVitis

Identifiers

PMID32528037
PMCPMC7290027
OpenAlexW3034422671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.