Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32527624›Full record

SynthesisEuropean urology focus2020

Risk of Virus Contamination Through Surgical Smoke During Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature on a Neglected Issue Revived in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era.

Nicola Pavan, Alessandro Crestani, Alberto Abrate, Cosimo De Nunzio, Francesco Esperto, Gianluca Giannarini, Antonio Galfano, Andrea Gregori, Giovanni Liguori, Riccardo Bartoletti and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European urology focus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Bibliometric analysis of occupational exposure in operating room from 1973 to 2022.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Colorectal Surgery in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. International cooperation group of emergency surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola PavanDepartment of Urology, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
Alessandro CrestaniUrology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Alberto AbrateUrology Section, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Cosimo De NunzioDepartment of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Francesco EspertoDepartment of Urology, Campus Biomedico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Gianluca GiannariniUrology Unit, Academic Medical Centre Hospital 'Santa Maria della Misericordia', Udine, Italy.
Antonio GalfanoUrology Unit, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Andrea GregoriUrology Unit, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni LiguoriDepartment of Urology, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
Riccardo BartolettiDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies, Urologic Unit, University of Pisa, Italy.
Francesco PorpigliaDivision of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy.
Alchiede SimonatoUrology Section, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Urology Unit, Department of Surgery, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
Carlo TrombettaDepartment of Urology, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
Andrea TubaroDepartment of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo FicarraDepartment of Human and Pediatric Pathology "Gaetano Barresi", Urologic Section, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giacomo NovaraDepartment Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. Electronic address: giacomonovara@gmail.com.
Research Urology Network (RUN)
University of Trieste · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITUniversity of Palermo · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITLuigi Sacco Hospital · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic raised concerns about the safety of laparoscopy due to the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diffusion in surgical smoke. Although no case of SARS-CoV-2 contagion related to surgical smoke has been reported, several international surgical societies recommended caution or even discouraged the use of a laparoscopic approach.

objectiveTo evaluate the risk of virus spread due to surgical smoke during surgical procedures. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched PubMed and Scopus for eligible studies, including clinical and preclinical studies assessing the presence of any virus in the surgical smoke from any surgical procedure or experimental model. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 24 studies. No study was found investigating SARS-CoV-2 or any other coronavirus. About other viruses, hepatitis B virus was identified in the surgical smoke collected during different laparoscopic surgeries (colorectal resections, gastrectomies, and hepatic wedge resections). Other clinical studies suggested a consistent risk of transmission for human papillomavirus (HPV) in the surgical treatments of HPV-related disease (mainly genital warts, laryngeal papillomas, or cutaneous lesions). Preclinical studies showed conflicting results, but HPV was shown to have a high risk of transmission.

conclusionsAlthough all the available data come from different viruses, considering that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been shown in blood and stools, the theoretical risk of virus diffusion through surgical smoke cannot be excluded. Specific clinical studies are needed to understand the effective presence of the virus in the surgical smoke of different surgical procedures and its concentration. Meanwhile, adoption of all the required protective strategies, including preoperative patient nasopharyngeal swab for COVID-19, seems mandatory. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this systematic review, we looked at the risk of virus spread from surgical smoke exposure during surgery. Although no study was found investigating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or any other coronavirus, we found that the theoretical risk of virus diffusion through surgical smoke cannot be excluded.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusHepatitis B virusInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalLaparoscopyPapillomaviridaeSmokeColectomyCondylomata AcuminataCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19GastrectomyHepatectomyHumansLaryngeal NeoplasmsMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPandemicsSmokeCOVID-19Minimally invasive surgerysmokeSurgicalVirus

Identifiers

PMID32527624
PMCPMC7274598
OpenAlexW3033495575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.