ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
A flexible network-based imputing-and-fusing approach towards the identification of cell types from single-cell RNA-seq data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MGPT: A Multi-task Graph Prompt Learning Framework for Drug Discovery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- A novel graph-based k-partitioning approach improves the detection of gene-gene correlations by single-cell RNA sequencing.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Single-Cell Analysis of the Transcriptome and Epigenome.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides an effective tool to investigate the transcriptomic characteristics at the single-cell resolution. Due to the low amounts of transcripts in single cells and the technical biases in experiments, the raw scRNA-seq data usually includes large noise and makes the downstream analyses complicated. Although many methods have been proposed to impute the noisy scRNA-seq data in recent years, few of them take into account the prior associations across genes in imputation and integrate multiple types of imputation data to identify cell types.
resultsWe present a new framework, NetImpute, towards the identification of cell types from scRNA-seq data by integrating multiple types of biological networks. We employ a statistic method to detect the noise data items in scRNA-seq data and develop a new imputation model to estimate the real values of data noise by integrating the PPI network and gene pathways. Meanwhile, based on the data imputed by multiple types of biological networks, we propose an integrated approach to identify cell types from scRNA-seq data. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed network-based imputation model can estimate the real values of noise data items accurately and integrating the imputation data based on multiple types of biological networks can improve the identification of cell types from scRNA-seq data.
conclusionsIncorporating the prior gene associations in biological networks can potentially help to improve the imputation of noisy scRNA-seq data and integrating multiple types of network-based imputation data can enhance the identification of cell types. The proposed NetImpute provides an open framework for incorporating multiple types of biological network data to identify cell types from scRNA-seq data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.