Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32527251›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2020

Requirements for (web-based) physical activity interventions targeting adults above the age of 65 years - qualitative results regarding acceptance and needs of participants and non-participants.

Frauke Wichmann, Claudia R Pischke, Dorothee Jürgens, Ingrid Darmann-Finck, Frauke Koppelin, Sonia Lippke, Alexander Pauls, Manuela Peters, Claudia Voelcker-Rehage, Saskia Muellmann

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Supporting Physical Activity and Quality of Life in Older Adults with Coronary Heart Disease: Development of a Web-Based Nursing Intervention.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Ecological Predictors of Older Adults' Participation and Retention in a Physical Activity Intervention.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  5. Experiences of technology for increasing physical activity of older adults: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025
    Review
  6. Staying engaged: a scoping review of psychological and motivational drivers of adherence to technology-supported physical activity in older adults.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Frauke WichmannInstitute for Public Health und Nursing Sciences - IPP, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany. wichmann@leibniz-bips.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5848-7200
Claudia R PischkeInstitute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Dorothee JürgensDepartment Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Ingrid Darmann-FinckInstitute for Public Health und Nursing Sciences - IPP, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Frauke KoppelinJade University of Applied Sciences Wilhelmshaven/Oldenburg/Elsfleth, Section Technology and Health for Humans, Oldenburg, Germany.
Sonia LippkeDepartment of Psychology & Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Alexander PaulsJade University of Applied Sciences Wilhelmshaven/Oldenburg/Elsfleth, Section Technology and Health for Humans, Oldenburg, Germany.
Manuela PetersDepartment Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Claudia Voelcker-RehageInstitute of Human Movement Science and Health, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.
Saskia MuellmannDepartment Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
University of Bremen · DEJade University of Applied Sciences · DELeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS · DEChemnitz University of Technology · DEConstructor University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01EL1422A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt remains unclear how physical activity (PA) interventions need to be designed to reach older adults and to be widely accepted in this target group. The aim of this study was to assess the acceptance of a web-based PA program, including individual intervention components as well as relevant contextual factors, and to specify requirements for future interventions.

methodsTwo hundred sixty-six participants of a PA intervention completed a questionnaire covering individual program components (content, structure, and context). Further, 25 episodic guided interviews focusing on reasons for (non-) participation were conducted with 8 participants and 17 non-participants. Following qualitative content analysis, different requirements were identified and organized based on the social-ecological model, resulting in a profile of requirements.

resultsBased on the participants' and non-participants' statements, six different levels of requirements affecting acceptance of and successful participation in a web-based PA intervention were identified. The individual fit was influenced by an interaction of different factors at the intrapersonal, sociocultural, content, spatial, digital and organizational levels. Several age- and gender-specific requirements were noted in the interviewed older adults. Men and women, as well as younger (< 70 years) and older (≥70 years) adults differed in terms of perceived enjoyment and benefits of socializing while exercising together, the time expenditure perceived to be acceptable, previous digital skills, as well as in perceptions that ambience and accessibility of exercise facilities in the neighborhood were important.

conclusionsTo motivate older adults to engage in PA and address different needs in terms of life circumstances and quality of life as well as differences in technical affinity, different requirement profiles should be included in the process of intervention development and implementation. Participatory development loops and modular offer formats are recommended for this.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services for the AgedInternetPatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overAttitudeComputersFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMalePopulation GroupsQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeAcceptanceImplementationOlder adultsPhysical activityPreventionRequirementsSocial-ecological modelWeb-based

Identifiers

PMID32527251
PMCPMC7291669
OpenAlexW3035619516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.