ArticleBMC microbiology2020
Elimination of "kitome" and "splashome" contamination results in lack of detection of a unique placental microbiome.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
97 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Microbiome alterations in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their offspring: A systematic review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- Age-related changes in the gut microbiota of a long-lived seabird suggest divergence from mammalian models.Royal Society open science · 2026Article
- Bile Microbiota Profiling in Obese and Non-Obese Patients: A Comparison of Shotgun Metagenomics and 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Microbial Signals in Cancer: Dissecting Host-Microbiota-Tumor Interactions and Potential Therapeutic Strategy.MedComm · 2026Review
- Maternal and infant gut microbiome.iMeta · 2026Review
- Role of microbiome in ocular surface disease: interpreting biology in a low-biomass environment.Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2026Review
- CroCoDeEL: accurate control-free detection of cross-sample contamination in metagenomic data.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Microbiological Profiling of Menstrual Blood Aspirated from the Uterus in Patients Undergoing Frozen Embryo Transfer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating Sequencing Strategies for Endometrial Microbiome Profiling in Endometrial Cancer: A Comparative Study of Short- and Long-Read 16S rRNA Approaches.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Microbial Contributions to Primate Reproduction.Evolutionary anthropology · 2026Review
- Basic Microbiome Analysis: Analytical Steps from Sampling to Sequencing.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- CRESSENT: a bioinformatics toolkit to explore and improve ssDNA virus annotation.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Spatial and temporal patterns of public transit aerobiomes.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Planning and Analyzing a Low-Biomass Microbiome Study: A Data Analysis Perspective.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Unveiling balanced prenatal microbial colonization in amniotic fluid through an integrated culture and sequencing approach.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Unveiling pathogens and contaminants: refining metagenomics for clinical diagnostics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Shotgun Metagenomic Analysis of Microbial Community Dynamics in Wastewater Treatment Through Constructed Wetlands.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- The Diagnostic Performance of a Four-Gene Digital Droplet PCR Panel for Urine Liquid Biopsy in Urothelial Bladder Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Benchmarking Cost-Effective DNA Extraction Kits for Diverse Metagenomic Samples.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA placental microbiome, which may be altered in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), has been described. However, publications raising doubts about the existence of a placental microbiome that is different than contaminants in DNA extraction kits and reagents ("kitomes") have emerged. The aims of this study were to confirm the existence of a placental microbiome distinct from contaminants and determine if it is altered in GDM mothers.
resultsWe first enrolled normal weight, obese and GDM mothers (N = 17) at term elective cesarean section delivery in a pilot case control study. Bacterial DNA was extracted from placental parenchyma, maternal and cord blood, maternal vaginal-rectal swabs, and positive and negative controls with the standard Qiagen/MoBio Power Soil kit. Placentas had significantly higher copies of bacterial 16S rRNA genes than negative controls, but the placental microbiome was similar in all three groups and could not be distinguished from contaminants in blank controls. To determine the source and composition of the putative placental bacterial community identified in the pilot study, we expanded the study to 10 subjects per group (N = 30) and increased the number and variety of negative controls (N = 53). We modified our protocol to use an ultraclean DNA extraction kit (Qiagen QIAamp UCP with Pathogen Lysis Tube S), which reduced the "kitome" contamination, but we were still unable to distinguish a placental microbiome from contaminants in negative controls. We noted microbial DNA from the high biomass vaginal-rectal swabs and positive controls in placental and negative control samples and determined that this resulted from close proximity well-to-well cross contamination or "splashome". We eliminated this source of contamination by repeating the sequencing run with a minimum of four wells separating high biomass from low biomass samples. This reduced the reads of bacterial 16S rRNA genes in placental samples to insignificant numbers.
conclusionsWe identified the problem of well-to-well contamination ("splashome") as an additional source of error in microbiome studies of low biomass samples and found a method of eliminating it. Once "kitome" and "splashome" contaminants were eliminated, we were unable to identify a unique placental microbiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.