Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32527223›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Feasibility and behavioral effects of prolonged static and dynamic standing as compared to sitting in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Uros Marusic, Martijn L T M Müller, Neil B Alexander, Nicolaas I Bohnen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04410055 (Effects of Dynamic Standing vs. Static Standing on Subjective Fatigue Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04410055 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effects of Dynamic Standing vs. Static Standing on Subjective Fatigue Symptoms

TypeinterventionalSponsorScience and Research Centre KoperRan2012 to 2022Enrolled120ConditionsDiabete Mellitus, Aging, Cognitive ChangeArmsSitting, Static standing, Dynamic standing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Uros MarusicFunctional Neuroimaging, Cognitive and Mobility Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Domino's farms, Lobby B-1000, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA. umarusic@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7420-2137
Martijn L T M MüllerFunctional Neuroimaging, Cognitive and Mobility Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Domino's farms, Lobby B-1000, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA.
Neil B AlexanderDivision of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Nicolaas I BohnenFunctional Neuroimaging, Cognitive and Mobility Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Domino's farms, Lobby B-1000, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA.

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MCHR)UL1TR000433 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$49.9M
Research Education CoreP30AG024824 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Neil Alexander · 2004 to 2026
$29.2M
Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000433NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024824NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical inactivity is prevalent in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and may exacerbate their clinical symptoms. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of 4-h regular versus more dynamic standing sessions while performing routine desktop activities as a non-exercise physical activity intervention in older adults with T2DM to increase non-exercise activity.

methodsTwelve older adult patients with T2DM (3 female; age 71 ± 4 years; Body mass index 34 ± 5 kg/m

resultsAll participants were able to complete all sessions. Oxygen consumption and overall movements progressively increased from sitting to static and dynamic standing, respectively (p < 0.001). The duration of breaks during standing (p = 0.024) and rate of total musculoskeletal discomfort development (p = 0.043) were lower in the dynamic standing compared to static standing sessions. There was no evidence of executive cognitive worsening during either standing session compared to sitting.

conclusionsProlonged 4-h standing as a simple non-exercise physical intervention is feasible in older adults with T2DM and may have metabolic (oxygen consumption) benefits. Increasing movement during desktop standing may offer incremental benefits compared to regular standing. Prolonged desktop standing might provide an effective intervention in T2DM older participants to target sedentariness.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04410055), retrospectively registered May 27, 2020.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Sitting PositionAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansSedentary BehaviorStanding PositionActive working placeCognitive functioningErgonomic adjustmentExecutive functionsMetabolic consumptionNon-exercise physical activity

Identifiers

PMID32527223
PMCPMC7291508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.