Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32527167›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of international medical research2020

Impact of endometrioma surgery on ovarian reserve: a prospective, randomized, pilot study comparing stripping with CO

Mariona Rius, Meritxell Gracia, Cristina Ros, María-Ángeles Martínez-Zamora, Cristian deGuirior, Lara Quintas, Francisco Carmona

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of international medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03826355 (Impact on Ovarian Reserve According to the Type of Ovarian Endometrioma Excision), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03826355 nacompletednot on this map

Impact on Ovarian Reserve According to the Type of Ovarian Endometrioma Excision: Laser Versus Conventional Cystectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Clinic of BarcelonaRan2017 to 2018Enrolled16ConditionsEndometriosis OvaryArmsCO2 (carbon dioxide) laser vaporisation, Stripping technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometrioma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariona RiusEndometriosis Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Meritxell GraciaEndometriosis Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina RosEndometriosis Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
María-Ángeles Martínez-ZamoraEndometriosis Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristian deGuiriorEndometriosis Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Lara QuintasEndometriosis Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco CarmonaEndometriosis Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0172-1761
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess ovarian reserve through antral follicle count (AFC) and ovarian volume (OV) determination after decapsulation (stripping technique) or CO

methodsThis prospective, randomized, blinded, self-controlled pilot study was set in a tertiary university hospital between January 2017 and December 2017, and included consecutive patients with bilateral ovarian endometriomas ≥3 cm. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under the title 'Impact on ovarian reserve according to the type of ovarian endometrioma excision: laser versus conventional cystectomy'; NCT03826355. For each patient, the endometrioma on one side was randomly selected to undergo CO

resultsA total of 16 patients were included. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in OV and AFC levels at baseline. At the 6-month follow-up, OV and AFC levels were significantly higher in the laser-treated group versus the stripping technique.

conclusionLower OV and AFC levels following excisional surgery for endometrioma versus CO

Indexed as

Ovarian ReserveAdultEndometriosisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparoscopyLasers, GasOvarian CystsOvarian FollicleOvaryPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyantral follicle countendometrioma decapsulationlaser vaporizationOvarian endometriomaovarian reserve

Identifiers

PMID32527167
PMCPMC7294500
OpenAlexW3035132047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.